I'm not sure that he'd be a suitable person to nominate Bishops and Archbishops of the Church of England. Benjamin Disraeli was well qualified to do this as a Hebrew Christian, a member of the Church of England.
2006-11-16 00:29:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Doethineb 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is nothing wrong with the Jewish community being involved with government, the problem arises when you have a situation like Iraq and Palestine. The British cabinet has a large contingency of Jewish Faith members i.e. Jack Straw, Nick Raynsford (ex cabinet member) are two i know of and I believe that 50 to 70% of the cabinet is Jewish. The problem is with such an interest as to the out come, how can unbiased decisions and opinions be made with regards to Israel? At the moment the Palestinians and Iraqis seem to have been the butt of decisions that reflect a leaning to Israel. Considering that America was until recently lead by Rumsfeld, Kissinger and other Jewish advisers in high places. It might be easy for you to see my point.
2006-11-16 09:23:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Redmonk 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Britain would be better off with a Conservative Prime Minister. Race, gender, religion and so on doesn't matter
2006-11-16 02:43:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by arnok 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Britain would be better of without any prime minister however we can try anything or any religion must be better than what we have got already
2006-11-15 23:42:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by peter s 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
If Bush go better with Jewish Prime Minister then Britain will go behind him. Britain has had lost it's own decisions making power
a long long ago!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-15 23:42:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Konfuzius 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
a million. His mom and dad have been Jews. 2. If he rather became a non secular Jew, there'd be no threat of him getting into with each and every of the "Asians", Nu Labour introduced in, which brings me to indicate variety... 3. Nu Labour destroyed English society previous fix, and finding on no rely if George Orwell became suitable or no longer, and/or how stable/undesirable a activity Labour did, no one will vote for Labour for 2 many years. 4. The left HATES Israel with a keenness. do no longer anticipate him to be a Zionist only because of the fact Hitler tried to kill his mom and dad. His father became a Marxist, after all. 5. there's a regulation, yet i'm unsure if it in effortless terms applies to Catholics, and Tony Bliar skirted it.
2016-10-15 15:11:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by feliu 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is funny how you ask that question as to say Jews are a race when in reality it is only a religion. So it will not really matter if the Prime Minister was a Jew, Protestant, Hindu, Baha'i, Roman Catholic, Monophysite, Muslim, Orisha, Baptist, Orthodox, Anglican, Rastafarianism, Mormon, Evangelist, Budist, Pentecostal, Methodist, Seven-day Adventist, Quakers, Shango Baptist, Jehovah Witness,Latter-Day Saints, Ethiopian Orthodox, Animist or Atheist so you might want to re-phase your question to obtain better answers.
2006-11-15 23:58:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Isn't this country in enough shite with terrorism at the moment? We need a Prime Minister who believes in his own country and people first...never mind what religion he believes in!!
2006-11-16 01:26:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by reggie 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
We have already had one Benjamin Disraeli,Earl of Beaconsfield was PM in the latter half of the 19th century.I think I am correct in saying he converted to the Anglican Church anyway what does religion matter after all Bliar and Brown profess to be Christians,except they don't follow the teachings of Jesus Christ.
2006-11-16 00:28:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rob Roy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Britain will be better if we scraped the government altogether and started again. In a hundred years time school kids will be studying us and going "how did they fool for it?".
2006-11-16 03:43:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by floppity 7
·
1⤊
0⤋