You can see it quite well with binoculars. If you do use a telescope, use the lowest available magnification, because the Andromeda galaxy is 6 times bigger than the Moon as seen in our sky!
Surprised that you have you never noticed it before? Shouldn't it be easily visible without any optical aid? After all, you can see the Moon easily. The answer is that it is very dim. You can see the bright core without any optical aid, but it looks smaller than the Moon and much, much dimmer. It is a galaxy, just like the Milky Way, and it isn't any brighter than the Milky Way, just smaller in the sky. So you need to really dark sky, far from city lights. If you can't see the Milky Way the sky is not dark enough. But even then you will be disappointed in what you can see. It will not look anything like the photographs in the books. That is because those photographs are all long time exposures that show light far dimmer than your eye could ever see, even with a telescope. Even in the telescope, you will only see the bright core, which will appear as a featureless roundish glow. The outer spiral structure, if you can see it at all, will seem to be a dim and disconnected area of separate objects, where the brighter knots in the spiral arms are brightest.
2006-11-16 01:06:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Andromeda galaxy can be seen with the naked eyes if you have good vision or dark skies because it's so bright and big. If you want to use something to view it better, 7x50 binoculars or a small telescope with a medium/low powered eyepiece would do nicely.
2006-11-19 14:04:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by minuteblue 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
" i prefer to view all the different planets and nebulae, galaxies, and so on." Mate, you do no longer ask plenty, do you? yet whilst the common's good, you have a great scope there. to help the place i will. Mars is a tiny purple dot in maximum amateur scopes now by way of fact it particularly is appreciably previous opposition (closest suggestions-set to us), and it grew to become into virtually the main distant opposition it particularly is besides. WIth approximately 300X you will possibly even see some markings, yet that's no longer elementary with a Dob for the scale of time you're able to stare upon it. you're able to be able to could wait a pair of years for a existence like Mars, and 9 years for an exceedingly good one. Saturn shouldn't seem starlike at something above 40X. The earrings are virtually part-on, even with the indisputable fact that it may nonetheless tutor a disc. Sorry, could pass. Others wil help extra. returned returned. actual, Saturn could by no ability seem starlike. It shoud be rather vivid and glow gradually, even at low magazine. detrimental collimation will mean much less sharp element on planets, even with the indisputable fact that it won't replace the magnification. the gap of Mars and the scale of its disc adjustments plenty over various weeks. there will be a extensive distinction from any date in 2009. in the previous spending your perplexing-earned on extra eyepieces, confirm you already know the thank you to visual reveal unit and what expectancies are real looking. the terrific use of a mid-sized Dob is to take it to a dismal place and element it at faint issues, or gadgets that conceal a good little bit of sky. it particularly is great for planets, yet planet viewing with the aid of any scope takes time and staying power. And verynow and then, you will probable regain interest in the moon. it particularly is elementary to work out, even with the indisputable fact that that's a great place with a great form of thrilling issues on it.
2016-10-22 04:39:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is possible only with the Hubble telescope.
2006-11-15 22:38:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by sam 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
read this, might help you...
2006-11-16 00:09:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by donttalkjustplay05 4
·
0⤊
0⤋