English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Judging just from intelligence alone, which occupations would not be over taxing on someone with a low intelligence level, albeit far from being retarded or even "slow."

2006-11-15 15:17:52 · 7 answers · asked by Jumpin' Jack Flash 1 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

7 answers

It would not be possible to list them all here. But, you cannot judge from intelligence or IQ alone. The individual should be given one or more aptitude tests, and evaluated for an occupation on the basis of interests, skills, trainability, etc. For example, the person might be mechanically inclined or may have no mechanical ability. It would not be right to choose an occupation solely on the basis that it is suited to individuals of lesser intelligence.
You should consult a state employment office or some other employment/career counseling center for starters.

2006-11-15 15:27:25 · answer #1 · answered by Steve-o-58 3 · 0 0

What I say under is as an atheist/agnostic. ------ specific, there's a correlation, yet even somebody with a "intense" IQ could understand this correlation does no longer teach squat with appreciate in the direction of the existence or non-existence of a god. If something (assuming the study valid), the relationship between IQ and faith teach that persons with "greater" IQ tend to have much less faith. Whoopee-do-do. theory in a god is a controversy of religion (theory that may no longer in line with info), no longer intelligence. only like the argument that faith in a god does no longer teach its existence, the shortcoming of religion in a god does no longer teach that a god does no longer exist. that would desire to be clean. in addition to, you are able to nonetheless reject institutionalized non secular perspectives in the direction of a god and yet nonetheless believe interior the existence of a extra robust ability previous themselves. I do only no longer supply a rattling the two way. it is not astonishing that participants of the nationwide Academy of technology are much less in all probability to believe in a private god. the flexibility to attempt a controversy is middle to the scientific technique. subsequently, considering one can't reliably attempt for the existence of god, it variety of feels logical that those human beings does no longer settle for the argument as being valid. I fail to work out the super handle regards to the correlation. So what?!? Do you sense a technique or the different extra appropriate through fact of it?

2016-12-10 09:59:35 · answer #2 · answered by hergenroeder 4 · 0 0

Clerk, teller, Walmart

2006-11-15 15:21:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

esither prime minister or president of any country.

2006-11-15 15:21:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

a politician

2006-11-15 15:19:38 · answer #5 · answered by CrazyDelmar 4 · 0 0

a lawyer

2006-11-15 15:19:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

cop

2006-11-15 15:22:49 · answer #7 · answered by ­Yuck Fahoo 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers