Why should the separation of church & state be abolished in the American Government?

Answer 1

There is no such separation. It's not then the Constitution, the ESTABLISHMENT clause is. That prevents the Government for creating a church or saying this is the church of the United States.

If I remember right it was in the papers of Thomas Jefferson that first brought up the separation of church and state, I may be wrong, you can look it up if it's important.

But lets say a church does want federal money to provide a service to the community, say Meal on Wheels and do it at loss. That's to say the money they receive wouldn't cover the cost of the program. They decide that they would do it for their fellow man. A lot of people would say NO, separation of church and state. I would say as long as they don't discriminate, don't discuss religion, don't wear their church uniforms if they have one, deliver the meal in an plain car marked with only Meals on Wheel, and agree to some, not a lot, of over site why not? Church's have almost always been able to deliver more aid cheaper then the government.

A lot of people have taken this way too far. First it not in the Constitution and second if the rules are carefully written and any church is willing to follow them why not let them provide the service and fill the need?

Just something to think about.

Answer 2

It shouldn't.

One of the basic realities for our founding fathers (and mothers) was the need for religious freedom. The separation of church and state is supposed to keep the government from imposing any one religion on its people.

I think we may be swinging too far the other way, though. Sometimes it looks like some people want "no religion" to be the official face of America. Christians (and every other religion) should be able to express their beliefs openly. Cutting the concept of God completely out of public discourse is just as wrong as trying to use the government to shove your beliefs down the throats of those who believe differently.

Rules that won't let you wear a cross openly (or a veil or whatever) are edging from separation to persecution.

Answer 3

Church and state should be separated because people have many different backgrounds and to make everyone in a state worship one God then that would cause all types of problems in the nation. We have enough problems already. This would make the Amendment about Freedom of Religion non existent and pointless. You have to take in consideration about the people who don't go to church and have no denomination. Religion is not for everyone. With church and state together then the person in charge of the state would make decisions based upon a belief that not everyone believes in.

Answer 4

Because church knows best.
Sure they messed up sometimes, for example church thought that sun revolves around the earth, and used its government influence to stifle the progress for centuries.
But that is in the past!
If church would only had the power of the government now, it would put an end too all these nonsense with theory of evolution and stem cells once and for all!

Answer 5

We should not abolish it.

Because we don't have a national religion.... the founders of our country wanted to be different from their former government in that respect....

There can be no freedom without the separation of Church and State.

It's a good thing. Leave it alone.

Answer 6

It absolutely should not. When a state establishes an official religion, as was the norm with congregationalism in this country's early years, tyranny will ensue. You no longer have what the baptists fought for so bravely, known as soul liberty - the right to worship God as your conscience dictates. Look at the Arab world of theocracy and tell me if this looks desirable to you. This problem was finally resolved by the bill of rights. In fact, if it hadn't been for a baptist preacher by the name of Leland, refusing to vote for it unless a bill of rights was included, securing the freedom of religion, it is highly doubtful it would have even passed. This was the very reason the pilgrims came here in the first place.

Answer 7

No atheist is familiar with how the universe replaced into once created. The idea of the tremendous bang presently matches what we do understand though about the increasing universe. Now the theorem of the tremendous bang replaced into once on the starting up presented up by a catholic priest so that is extremely now not in conflict with faith in holding with SE. The difficulty which incorporates your statement that the completed ingredient demands some ingredient of create that is that you do not extremely recognize that both you purely experience it with the information you experience you've gotten in the front of you. the inspiration that god existed and not using a author ought to grant you some idea how we will be able to experience that concern exists formerly to existence as all of us recognize and may have honestly for ever and ever. The tremendous bang might want to have befell billions of cases decreased in length and befell once extra in accordance to three theories. The invisible hand of god is used as a default good the following, by saying on condition that we do no thoroughly understand the production of the universe than it must be attributed to an invisible being. nicely the early cultures did not understand the image voltaic they in a good number of cases attributed it to a fiery chariot pushed by a god. similar premise in my mind purely thinking the shown truth that i won't be able to conceive of a few ingredient at this aspect does now not make it not conceivable, besides the undeniable fact that i do not ought to inn to the default function of attributing it to a god.

Answer 8

Absolutely! Did we have school shootings, and as much crime and hate before? Had God been in our schools, perhaps Columbine and others like it would not have happened. Freedom of religion? You have always had it, even when it was a part of our schools. No one was forced to participate in Christmas parties, birthday parties, pledge of allegance, etc. It was a choice, not a demand. Our kids are growing up athiests now that they have removed religion from everywhere except church. How sad. And worse yet, not only are they athiest, they are hippocrites! They celebrate Christmas, go figure. Sounds like its a convenience only when they want it. Lets give and accept gifts, but we wont attribute the holiday to its real purpose, the birth of Christ.

Answer 9

Since separation of church & sate is not in the constitution, there is no need to abolish it.

Answer 10

It should not be abolished. It is one of our most cherished freedoms, and is one reason why our forefathers came to this country in the first place - to avoid religious persecution.