My court date was March 7th of this year. I was served on Feb 24th 11 days before the court date and was unable to get off work without it costing me my job to attend. Now they are garnishing my wages. Can I fight this for unfair notice? Does anyone know any pro bono lawyers in Missouri.
2006-11-15 12:30:28 · 7 answers · asked by slytherin_95 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You are stuck with the judgement since you didn't show up to contest the suit against you. In a civil suit, if one side doesn't show up, the other side automatically wins.
You should have contacted the court and requested a continuance. If this happens again, call the court and ask for the case to be continued. If they want a form filed, you can do a google search and find the format for the continuance request for your state.
2006-11-15 12:59:00 · answer #1 · answered by Mama Pastafarian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine the reason USADA have a minimum of 18 days of RBT formerly the strive against is that that is the effect of the RANDOMNESS of the try. by randomly figuring out on the dates, they have arise by accident to have the most suitable RBT 18 days formerly. yet this doesn't recommend that RBT will continually have a 18 day window, it purely so take position that the RANDOMNESS picked that date to be the most suitable sorting out day. perhaps the subsequent bout which will patronize the RBT may have a 24 day window, or an afternoon formerly the strive against or again previous 18 days formerly the strive against. it really is the must be the authentic manifestation of RANDOM, no set dates. even although the ball is bcak on PBF's nook, this flow by the Kingpin does inevitably mirror the pursuance of their bout. bear in mind this issues: a million. Floyd demanded to have the RBT as a lot because the strive against day, no extra window days to compromise. 2. Floyd eageraly favor to have the Lion's percentage because he idea he outselled PAcman of their very last respective fights. 3. Glove weights, strive against area, penalty on overweighing etc. etc. might want to be repositioned. the ingredient is, negotiations can not purely be made by %or Floyd themeselves, contract must be MUTUAL. and no matter if %will bow all the way down to three demands of FLoyd, there is extra demands we may be able to listen from funds may. So the flow of the Pacman can purely represent a ambitious flow for him and a touch progression contained in the negotiating table, no extra no a lot less. the burden remains on us boxing followers, we ought to stay hoping for this to take position. besides the undeniable fact that that is amazingly painful for us to anticipate and to be damage again if this strive against might want to finally end up on our mind's eye once extra.
2016-11-29 04:29:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt you will be able to fight it. You had enough advance notice to prepare and whether or not you were able to leave work probably won't make a difference as you knew about the court date and failed to appear or make other arrangements with the court. I am not a lawyer, but it doesn't sound good to me.
2006-11-15 12:35:00 · answer #3 · answered by Slimsmom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're stuck. Pay up.
Look how long you waited before you posted here. This matter obviously wasn't a high priority with you until they started garnishing your money.
PS. I don't believe you showed your employer the subpoena and was told you could not attend court. A judge won't believe it either.
2006-11-15 12:38:07 · answer #4 · answered by Yak Rider 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
by not showing up, you effectively pled guilty to what ever it was. Your screwed!
2006-11-15 12:33:35 · answer #5 · answered by grapelady911 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
use O.J. Simpson's lawyer
2006-11-15 12:38:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God, how stupid.
2006-11-15 12:32:29 · answer #7 · answered by Johnny P 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋