you could either burn to death, suffocate, or drown...which would you choose, you must pick one of these.
2006-11-15 11:53:51 · 10 answers · asked by ? 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Suffocate... burning to death is terrible! Drowning would be horrible because of the water in my lungs... as for suffocating, I might feel powerless and it's painful, but I'd rather have it that way...
2006-11-15 11:55:37 · answer #1 · answered by misery 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Suffocate
2006-11-15 22:02:36 · answer #2 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both burning & drowning are extremely painful. Suffocation isn't much better, but between these three choices, that's the one I would pick.
2006-11-15 20:06:35 · answer #3 · answered by Shadow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a famous fictional starship captain once said, "I don't believe in the no-win scenario."
Really though, I've heard people who were seriously burned and lived say that it is painful beyond belief. So I definitely wouldn't choose that one.
Probably suffocation, especially if you don't even no it like where you are breathing in CO instead of oxygen.
2006-11-15 19:56:19 · answer #4 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uggh, that's a scary question. And I hope you're not planning to commit suicide. If I HAD to choose, I would prefer to drown. I hate saying that. I'm superstitious.
2006-11-15 19:56:03 · answer #5 · answered by kid_at_heart 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not that I'm wishing myself gone or anything, but I'd have to say drown.
2006-11-15 20:03:18 · answer #6 · answered by Milkaholic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
drown, it's supposed to be peaceful.
2006-11-15 20:02:27 · answer #7 · answered by Dally4now2006 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
too horrible to choose
2006-11-15 20:08:25 · answer #8 · answered by shellswood06 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i choose none
2006-11-15 19:57:14 · answer #9 · answered by Brittany R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll take suffocate for 100, please.
2006-11-15 19:55:35 · answer #10 · answered by ericscribener 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋