2006-11-15 10:47:56 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
yes. that was three hours of my life i want back
2006-11-15 10:50:04 · answer #1 · answered by maxinator01 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Only the first half sucked. The only thing good about the first half is when Kate Winslet disrobes. Except for that, it is a crappy romantic chick flick. Then the boat hits the iceberg and the boat starts to sink and it started getting really good. And then Leo's character dies. I almost stood up and cheered. His character was so annoying. I avoided his movies for a long time because of his character in titanic. Now I think he's one of the best actors around. But I still can't watch Titanic because of him.
2006-11-15 10:56:32 · answer #2 · answered by Glenn N 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes - it's the worst of all time in my opinion, and it also set the stage for some other movies to be destroyed, such as Pearl Harbor.
This version was politically correct against "the rich" and it was not accurate. There are two or three old classics about the titanic that are much better.
2006-11-15 10:51:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
No, but the second one will be. I kid you not; there's a second one comming out, I saw the trailer on the internet. Something about Jack really being cryogentically frozen and is found by researchers. They basically bring him back to life in NYC, then he escapes and runs around the city crying about how he can't believe Rose is dead.
Yea, THAT will be the worst movie ever made.
2006-11-15 11:18:46 · answer #4 · answered by bangmandown 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, any movie where Kate Winslet appears naked can't be all that bad.
The worst movie that I have seen (before I walked out of the theater) was 'The Stupids' with Tom Arnold.
2006-11-15 10:56:24 · answer #5 · answered by mesquitemachine 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nope, I liked it. I think there are many movies that can be called bad, but I don't think Titanic falls into that category, see all the answers.
2006-11-15 10:53:21 · answer #6 · answered by This, That & such 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO! The Hot Chick, Napoleon Dynamite and Undercover Brother all suck way more than Titanic.
2006-11-15 10:55:40 · answer #7 · answered by Bill B 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No Friggin way it was one of the most expensive movies to make and it made more money than the lord of rings and finding nemo
but it was like more of a chick flick
2006-11-15 10:51:01 · answer #8 · answered by Guitar Hero #1 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Oh my god, you have BRAIN issues if you think that movie was bad. It was one of the best movies ever made. Right up there with the likes of Forrest Gump....
2006-11-15 13:42:13 · answer #9 · answered by Dasher 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Overrated! I seen it once, and that was enough for me. I was not sad after watching it like some people.
2006-11-15 11:10:25 · answer #10 · answered by Craig C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hardly.
2006-11-15 11:40:50 · answer #11 · answered by shkspr 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋