Yes,look beyond.
2006-11-15 19:41:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Yes there is always more to the picture then meets the eye. Everyone thinks and sees differant them each other. Some will see parts of the picture, and others will see the other parts. No 2 people see a picture the same. Have a nice day.
2006-11-15 08:49:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by maxine 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There could be more to the picture than meets the eye, but there may not be. It depends on who's eye is meeting the picture and how much that eye can take in. I would say that it is all in the eye of the beholder. But then again, what the hell do I know! I don't even know which side of perfect I live on!
2006-11-15 15:22:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ragdoll 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hey hey, my my.
Of course. Pictures, at their best, are only two dimensional visual representations, although some project an illusion of depth. They may not fully reflect subtle nuances of context.
This phenomenon is why we are so easily manipulated by images removed from their temporal context, and cropped from their surroundings.
We project our own silent language of context and experiences upon a picture, and we all may see something slightly different.
News photos are notorious for framing the shot, the underscore a particular intensity or severity.
And sometimes there is less to the picture than meets the eye.
But it's better to burn out than to fade away.
Because rust never sleeps.
2006-11-15 18:36:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ragnarok 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Usually
2006-11-15 08:50:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ron B. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2006-11-15 17:15:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's always more to the picture than meets the eye. Look very closely & you'll see.
2006-11-15 08:48:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shadow 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When U remove the eyes, theres only the picture in the mind, left.
inspired by blindness.
2006-11-15 08:48:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There definately is! You have to look inside the picture to get the true meaning.
2006-11-15 08:47:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by lttlmischievious 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yeah - pictures aren't 3 dimensional and it's that extra dimension that mean the most.
2006-11-15 08:48:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by icddppl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋