OJ Simpson on November 27 and 29 will tell the world IF he killed Nicole Simpson and how he would If he did it. Whats is peoples opinions?
2006-11-15 07:23:26 · 9 answers · asked by Wheaties 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
If you're black, he's not guilty - not necessarily innocent, however. If you're white, he is not innocent, and definitely guilty.
OJ is perhaps our most racially divisive celebrity.
When he heard the verdict at the murder trial, OJ must have felt as relieved as if he had just taken a giant dump.
2006-11-15 07:32:33 · answer #1 · answered by TarKettle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When it happened and the court case and everything, I didn't think there was enough evidence to say he did it for sure. So while I thought it a possibility I would have said not guilty then. But now that he is writing this book, I think he is guilty almost for sure. I suspect he feels guilty, and he is trying to clear his conscience through confession while not actually confessing.
If you've ever read the Scarlet Letter, it is similar. The minister and the main character had an affair, she was caught but he was not. He tried to clear his conscience by punishing himself through whipping, by standing on a scaffold (but only at night when none could see him). She felt better before because she had been caught and punished, but since no one knew of his transgression he went unpunished and felt guilty. He did not feel better until he went up on the scaffold in front of everyone, so that everyone knew what he did.
I believe that is what OJ is doing now. With this book he is attempting to stand on the scaffold as it were, attempting to brand a scarlet "A" into his chest as the Minister did. He is attempting to punish himself without others having to know about it. But only when he confesses (and completely, not this "if I had done it" foolishness) will he feel better (or at least, that is how I now see it).
2006-11-15 07:36:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think he's completely guilty. Otherwise, why would he have made police chase him in a car for so long? An innocent person wouldn't have run from the police - he was trying to get away out of fear of being caught. And I think this book isn't going to help his cause - of course he's going to say he's not guilty. But it's only going to attract negative attention to him.
2006-11-15 07:29:04 · answer #3 · answered by Sailor Jupiter 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We had a Geneticist from Berkeley communicate at my college and that i went to his seminar. i could no longer have faith the DNA evidence of Goldman's blood In OJ's automobile, homestead, outfits, sidewalk, and so on. Gang bangers get positioned away on a daily basis on much less convincing evidence. to blame.
2016-10-22 03:45:28 · answer #4 · answered by trowell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The guy is as guilty as the ocean is wet! Read the trial transcripts!! Johny Cochran taught him the trick with the glove and his jury had the collective IQ of your average retarded donkey! It's the single most glaring failure of justice in all of American history!!
2006-11-15 21:32:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Irresponsible.
2006-11-16 23:30:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
whatever. oj is not a thought in my mind. he's trying to sell books. i bet he says he didn't do it. can you believe the guy?
2006-11-15 07:31:22 · answer #7 · answered by practicalwizard 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was found guilty in the civil proceedings and not guilty in the criminal proceedings.He is a free man.He is not looking for his wifes killer.there are no other suspects and never have been......................guilty
2006-11-15 08:01:49 · answer #8 · answered by Paul I 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
100% GUILTY
2006-11-15 07:40:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋