"Crusade" and "Jihad" are the same thing?

Question

Both words can be applied to a struggle to change something.

Or a Holy War.

So why do Muslims insist the medieval "Crusades" were "Genocide" but their "Jihad" against the West is noble and holy and its good to kill infidels blah blah.

Yet more hypocricy?

Answer 1

boring boring boring...not all Muslims are terrorist.....get a life

Answer 2

The first occurred nearly a thousand years ago. Since then Christianity has been through a reformation and an enlightenment. The crusades occurred at a time when religion was everything and Islam was on the march, spreading its empire. It was in Spain for several centuries. The crusades attempted to halt this advance. So, the two things are not the same, and they occurred centuries apart.

Answer 3

First of all.. the crusades were not started by Christians as an offensive conflict, but rather as a defensive conflict

1. The Crusades were not acts of unprovoked agrgression by Europe against the islamic world, but were a delayed response to CENTURIES of muslim agression which gre fiercer than ever in the 11th century .
A few examples:

* Early in the 8th century, 60 christian pilgrims from Amorium were crucified by muslim raiders.
* Around the same time, a Muslim governer of Cesarea seized another group of pilgrims from Iconium and all executed as spies, except for a small number that converted to ISLAM!
*Later Brutal subordination and violence became the rule of the day for Christians in the Holy Land.
*In 772 The caliph al mansur ordered the hands of Christians and Jews to be stamped with a distinctive symbol (nazi's would use the same tactic on their persecution of jews and all perceived enemies or undesirables).
789-Muslims behead a monk who had converted from Islam, and then they plunder the Bethlehem Monastery of St. Theodosius, killing many more monks.
by 937 Muslims had destroyed many monasteries destroyed in jerusalem, as well the famous Church of the Calvary and the Church of the Resurrection.

2. Finally, by this time, it was the Byzantines who had enough, and moved from a defensive policy to a offensive policy, recapturing, Crete, Cicilia, Cyprus, parts of Syria and even the ancient christian city of Antioch. - These were wars for the recapture of christian lands* and the defense of christians, NOT religous imperialism(* 2/3 of which had formerly been the christian world - CENTURIES before the crusades).

3. In Islamic theology, if any land ever belonged to the house of Islam, it belongs FOREVER, and muslims must wage war to regain control over it!
That is why in 974 the Sunni Caliph; Abbasid, declares Jihad..Starting yearly campaigns of holy war against the christians. Which further steamrolled into more and more bloodshed and division.

Ofcourse, not every euro crusaders motives were pure. More than once, many fell from the ideals of the christian pilgrims. But the dogma that the crusades were unprovoked, imperialist actions against the peaceful, indigenous Muslim population is simply historically innaccurate and reflects distase for western civilzation rather genuine historical research.

Answer 4

Wow, such an unique question. One we've truthfully not seen earlier... enable me positioned this obtainable fairly sluggish because it variety of feels you persons have lots of issues information. First, a touch one isn't a murdering scumbag who has dedicated this style of heinous crime hostile to humanity that the perfect penalty could be utilized. second, it is not 2 aspects of a similar coin yet you those who look to have self assurance abortion could be a way of birth control can't get that through your cranium. Society has the right and duty to attend to killers and criminals and the lack of life penalty is the perfect software of societal will. the straightforward actuality is, and that i'm nonetheless holding it user-friendly so that you adult males stand a probability of information, that the lack of life penalty will be an powerful device in coping with criminals and in deterring destiny acts were it utilized as written. extremely the liberal mindset of backing criminals and blaming the sufferer means that we are compelled to bear multiple appeals and stretch a procedure out a techniques previous it is needed limits. back i do not anticipate you to drag your head from the sand and face the actual shown actuality that your argument is hypocritical and stupid yet no count number the way you try to obfuscate the data they'll continually will out. No, i do not care what different international locations are doing. No, i do not care that less than a million% of the folk on lack of life row were got here across innocuous. No, i do not care in case you mistakenly imagine that the lack of life penalty has a racial bias. Do your own study and discover the position both honestly bias honestly are contained in the criminal justice device. Have an afternoon.

Answer 5

No. Jihad is far more complicated than that. The Crusades were a military effort to take back the Holy Land from the Muslims, or as they were called, the Infidel.

Don't let cable news educate you. Pick up a book.

Answer 6

The Crusades were led by the Catholic church to unite the European kings under the church leadership. 1400 years ago the Moslems took over Jerusalem by a peace treaty which was singed by the head of the
Roman Church and the Moslem Leader called Omar Ibn Al Katab. The Romans Church demanded that: The protection of Christian Church, the protection of Christians pilgrimage to the holly cities Jerusalem and Bethlehem and Nazareth ". not to allow Jews to live in Holly city of Jerusalem."
The crusaders claimed that the Moslems violated the treaty by limiting the numbers of Pilgrims and allowing Christ killers to live in the old city of Jerusalem .When the crusaders occupied Jerusalem they killed, more than 50000 Moslems and 5000 Jews, they were all beheaded.

Answer 7

There is nothing holy about killing innocent people over a stupid religion. Neither side is right in trying to justify it .... If one considers how in France, Italy, the Holy Roman Empire in the 1200s, hundreds of thousands of heritics perished persuant to the authority of the Catholic Chruch. I can no more defend Tamerlane or Barbarossa or Richard the II than I could those killed in religious wars today. Holy War is an oxymoran.
Nobody invited the Crusaders to go over to the Middle East.

Answer 8

By my simple understanding they have more in common than they don't. To die in Jihad equals automatic entry into Paradise. To die in a Crusade equalled total absolution of all sins and guaranteed entry into heaven. Where our present day middle Eastern chums are making their damning mistake is Jihad is a holy war to protect Islam, not to blow up a bunch soldiers or students or women and children, but to defend Islam. Thus the islamic equivalent of hell is getting a lot of trade right now.

Answer 9

I have not heard that the Muslims think of the crusades as genocide but you may be right. However what they were was a very nasty type of warfare conducted to bring money and land to those who lead them under the pretence they were fighting to protect some religious principle. When they attacked Jerusalem there were as many Christians there and defending their city as there were Muslims

Answer 10

Jihad, Crusade - it's all the same, a war for a stupid, pointless and unjustifiable reasons.
Causes are stupid. Hell, I'd agree more with the invasion of Iraq if it really was about oil rather than a change of ideology. A war about resources makes more sense than a war for a stupid cause.

Answer 11

Jihad against the west noble...I guess because they are doing it. Why do people dismiss the crusades but not the jihads...not their religion.

Not all Jihads are bad. A junkie wages a Jihad against himself and the drug and you have daily Jihads to remain faithful to Allah.

but yeah, I see your point but its YAHWEH's people and they are all crazy.