....and you were stranded and starving like that rugby team and had nothing to eat but dead passengers, which would you eat first, the women or the men?
2006-11-15 06:27:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Easy, the men gotta go.
2006-11-15 06:34:20 · answer #1 · answered by Bean 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well i would not care if it was a girl or a guy i would eat the person who smelled the best because it is bad enough i had to eat a human body i would hate even more for it to smell bad when i am eating it.
2006-11-15 15:14:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would never be in a plane that was flying over the himalayas.
2006-11-15 15:05:19 · answer #3 · answered by cashis 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The women and only the women. As often as they wanted.
2006-11-15 14:42:32 · answer #4 · answered by Sid B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Men are much more muscular than women, so I'd have to start with the chicks. More tender cuts, ya know?
2006-11-15 14:30:08 · answer #5 · answered by sexmagnet 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The woman, it would make you smarter, eating the men would just make you fart more and scratch your ba@@@ a lot!
2006-11-17 08:21:32 · answer #6 · answered by newfie272 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd starve - I couldn't eat a bar-b-que'd human - sorry.
2006-11-15 14:34:58 · answer #7 · answered by You'llneverguess 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
leaves, tree bark, there has to be something edible even if I have to walk miles to find it.If not I guess I would die of starvation.
2006-11-15 19:13:08 · answer #8 · answered by lee lee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably the most fatty people. the fat would provide more engery. but i would have to cook them, i couldn't eat them raw.
2006-11-15 15:39:14 · answer #9 · answered by monkmonk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are a sick person. Seek help.
2006-11-15 15:46:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋