English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-15 06:17:11 · 8 answers · asked by Billy Z 1 in Entertainment & Music Movies

8 answers

definately not

2006-11-15 06:21:35 · answer #1 · answered by The Saint 2 · 0 0

No, none of the Matrix movies will ever be better than the 1st. The others are pretty bad compared to the 1st but still enjoyable to a degree.

2006-11-15 06:19:32 · answer #2 · answered by Zach 2 · 0 0

No. However, what is disturbing is Home Alone 2 made more money at the Box Office than the first Matrix.

2006-11-15 06:19:58 · answer #3 · answered by scotty_b_1976 3 · 0 0

I don't think so...1st movie is much better than 2nd. Usually next part to 1st does not have a great impact. But in the case of Terminator 2, it does have a great impact as 1st doesn't have.

2006-11-15 06:24:30 · answer #4 · answered by usm 1 · 0 0

They are both very nice films. In the first, it's interesting to find out about Neo and the 'real world', the 'dream world'. The second, i love the action, the fights between Neo and the Smithes, and between Neo and the men of the 'frenchman'. They both are excellent, but i must go for the first one.

2006-11-15 06:22:36 · answer #5 · answered by Knight Sirius 3 · 0 0

Nope. That trilogy went down hill after the first one.

2006-11-15 06:20:34 · answer #6 · answered by Mithrandir 2 · 0 0

Ewwwwwww.. NOOO way !!!! all of the 'matrix' movies suckkkk !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! never understood the first one and never bothered seeing the sequels either !!!!!!!!!

2006-11-15 09:40:20 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

yes, because it is more complete

2006-11-15 06:21:25 · answer #8 · answered by hahahaX 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers