This has been buggin me for a while.... What does it mean to be a dwarf planet a.k.a. Pluto?

Question

I know i must have missed spelled dwarf planet wrong, mha bad. Just not big on scienec just would like to know.

Answer 1

The science writer, Dava Sobel, has just published a nice little book that talks about all this stuff for non-science people. Check it out at the library. It's called "The Planets" and it has the latest stuff in it.

Answer 2

No. You spelled it right. It's "misspelled" that you misspelled (and "scienec", but that was probably a typing error).
"The International Astronomical Union (IAU), the official scientific body for astronomical nomenclature, defines a "dwarf planet" as a celestial body that, within the Solar System,
(a) is in orbit around the Sun;
(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape;
(c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit; and
(d) is not a satellite
At present, the term only applies to objects in the Solar System. It is considered to be separate and distinct from "planets" and "small solar system bodies".
The IAU's position on dwarf planets within our solar system was formally adopted at the 2006 IAU general assembly. It differs from the definition of "planet" in that a dwarf planet has not cleared its orbital neighbourhood. Before the adoption of the 2006 resolution, there was no formally specified scientific definition of "dwarf planet".
Under the IAU's definition, our solar system is currently considered to have three dwarf planets: Ceres, Pluto and Eris. However, many more objects could be added to the list once it has been determined whether they fulfill criterion."

Answer 3

Pltuo recently has been classified as an asteriod not a planet, it is too small, but I guess it called a dwarf planet becaus it is small.

Answer 4

The smallest, and you spelled dwarf right.

Answer 5

to be small...

Answer 6

The International Astronomical Union (IAU), the official scientific body for astronomical nomenclature, defines a "dwarf planet" as a celestial body that, within the Solar System,[1]

(a) is in orbit around the Sun;
(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape;
(c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit; and
(d) is not a satellite
At present, the term only applies to objects in the Solar System.[2] It is considered to be separate and distinct from "planets" and "small solar system bodies".

The IAU's position on dwarf planets within our solar system was formally adopted at the 2006 IAU general assembly. It differs from the definition of "planet" in that a dwarf planet has not cleared its orbital neighbourhood. Before the adoption of the 2006 resolution, there was no formally specified scientific definition of "dwarf planet".

Under the IAU's definition, our solar system is currently considered to have three dwarf planets: Ceres, Pluto and Eris. However, many more objects could be added to the list once it has been determined whether they fulfill criterion (b).

Contents [hide]
1 List of dwarf planets
2 Size and mass of dwarf planets
3 Orbital dominance
4 Contention
5 Types of dwarf planets
6 See also
7 References
8 External links



[edit] List of dwarf planets
The IAU has officially identified three celestial bodies that have immediately received "dwarf planet" classification:[3]

Dwarf planets Name Ceres Pluto Eris
MPC number 1 134340 136199
Region of Solar system Asteroid belt Kuiper belt Scattered disc
Diameter 975×909 km 2306±20 km 2400±100 km
Mass in kg
compared to Earth 9.5×1020 kg
.00016 ~1.305×1022 kg
.0022 ~1.5×1022 kg (est.)
.0025
Mean equatorial radius*
in km 0.0738
471 0.180
1,148.07 0.19
~1,200
Volume*
0.00042
0.005
0.007

Density (in Mg/m3) 2.08 2.0
Equatorial gravity (in m/s2) 0.27 0.60
Escape velocity (in km/s) 0.51 1.2
Rotation period (d)
(in sidereal days) 0.3781 -6.38718
(retrograde)
Orbital radius* (AU)
mean
mean in km 2.5-2.9
2.766
413,715,000 29.66-49.30
39.48168677
5,906,376,200 37.77-97.56
67.6681
10,210,000,000
Orbital period*(a)
(in sidereal Years) 4.599 248.09 557
Mean orbital speed
(in km/s) 17.882 4.7490 3.436
Orbital Eccentricity 0.080 0.24880766 0.44177
Orbital inclination 10.587° 17.14175° 44.187°
Inclination of the equator from the orbit
(see Axial tilt) 4° 119.61°
Mean surface temperature (in K) 167 40 30
Number of natural satellites 0 3 1
Date of Discovery January 1, 1801 February 18, 1930 January 5, 2005

*Measured relative to the Earth.

Additionally, there are several bodies potentially qualifying as "dwarf planets". Among these the following are known or thought to be greater than around 750 km in diameter:

Possible dwarf planets Name Category Diameter Mass
2005 FY9 ("Easterbunny") Cubewano 1600 – 2000? km unknown
Orcus Plutino 840 - 1880 km 6.2 - 7.0 × 1020 kg
Sedna Scattered-Extended object 1180–1800 km 1.7-6.1 × 1021 kg
2003 EL61 ("Santa") Cubewano ~ 1500 km ~4.2 × 1021 kg
Quaoar Cubewano 989 - 1346? km 1.0-2.6 × 1021 kg
Charon
(satellite of Pluto) Plutino 1207 km ± 3 km (1.52±0.06)×1021 kg
2002 TC302 Scattered disc object ≤ 1200 km unknown
Varuna Cubewano ~936 km ~5.9 × 1020 kg
2002 UX25 Cubewano ~910 km ~7.9 × 1020 kg
2002 TX300 Cubewano <900 km unknown
Ixion Plutino <822 km unknown

The status of Charon, currently regarded as a satellite of Pluto, remains uncertain as there is presently no clear definition of what distinguishes a satellite system from a binary (double planet) system. The original draft resolution (5)[2] presented to the IAU stated that Charon could be considered a planet because:

Charon independently would satisfy the size and shape criteria for planetary status (and in the terms of the final resolution, for the status of dwarf planet)
Charon, on account of its large mass relative to Pluto, revolves with Pluto around a common barycentre located in space between Pluto and Charon rather than around a point located within Pluto.
This definition, however, was not preserved in the IAU's final resolution. It is unknown if it will be taken up at a future date. If a similar definition were to be adopted, Charon would be added to the list of dwarf planets.

The second, third, and fourth largest asteroids (Vesta, Pallas and Hygiea) could be classified as dwarf planets if it is shown that their shape is determined by hydrostatic equilibrium. At present this has not been demonstrated conclusively.[4]


[edit] Size and mass of dwarf planets
The upper and lower limits to the size and mass of dwarf planets are not specified in IAU resolution 5A. There is strictly no upper limit, and an object larger or more massive than Mercury that is considered not to have "cleared the neighborhood around its orbit" may still be classified as a dwarf planet.

The lower limit is determined by the concept of hydrostatic equilibrium shape, but the size or mass at which an object attains this shape is undefined, and empirical observations suggest that it may vary according to the composition and history of the object. The original draft of IAU resolution 5 defined hydrostatic equilibrium shape as applying "to objects with mass above 5×1020 kg and diameter greater than 800 km",[2] but this language was not retained in the final resolution 5A that was passed.

According to some astronomers, the new definition could mean the addition of up to 45 new dwarf planets.[5][6]


[edit] Orbital dominance
Main article: Clearing the neighbourhood
Using a parameter developed by S. Alan Stern and Harold F. Levison, Steven Soter and other astronomers have argued for a distinction between dwarf planets and the other eight planets based on their inability to "clear the neighborhood around their orbits", that is, to remove smaller bodies whose orbits bring them nearby by collision, capture, or gravitational disturbance. This concept is combined with a concept of orbital dominance measured in terms of the ratio of the mass of a planetary candidate to the combined mass of all other objects in its vicinity. Dwarf planets are too small in mass to significantly alter their environment in the manner of a planet.

There are several other theories that try to differentiate between planets and dwarf planets, but the current definition of what constitutes a planet uses this concept.

Stern et al. introduce a parameter Λ, expressing the probability of an encounter resulting in a given deflection of orbit. The value of this parameter in Stern’s model is proportional to the square of the mass and inversely proportional to the period. Following the authors, this value can be used to estimate the capacity of a body to clear the neighbourhood of its orbit. Stern and Levison found a gap of five orders of magnitude in Λ between the smallest terrestrial planets and the largest asteroids and KBOs:

Planetary discriminants
Body Mass (ME*)
Λ/ΛE**
µ***
Mercury 0.055 0.0126 9.1×104
Venus 0.815 1.08 1.35×106
Earth 1.00 1.00 1.7×106
Mars 0.107 0.0061 1.8×105
Ceres 0.00015 8.7×10−9 0.33
Jupiter 317.7 8510 6.25×105
Saturn 95.2 308 1.9×105
Uranus 14.5 2.51 2.9×104
Neptune 17.1 1.79 2.4×104
Pluto 0.0022 1.95×10−8 0.077
Eris 0.005 3.5×10−8 0.10

*ME in Earth masses.
**Λ/ΛE = M2/P, in Earth masses squared per year.
***µ = M/m, where M is the mass of the body, and m is the aggregate mass of all the other bodies that share its orbital zone.



[edit] Contention
A number of scientists expressed their disagreement[7] with the currently adopted IAU definition of "dwarf planet" by means of car bumper stickers and about 300 scientists signed a petition against the related redefinition of "planet", stating that they will not use it.[8]

While accepting the characterization of "dwarf planet" for Pluto and Eris (dwarf-planet in this case meaning just a "small planet"), Stern rejects the current IAU definition of planet, both in terms of defining "dwarf planets" as something other than a type of planet, and in using orbital characteristics (rather than intrinsic characteristics) of objects to define them as dwarf planets.[9] Thus, he and his team will still refer to Pluto as the ninth planet. One should also note, that it will be in pages hosted by NASA and controlled by Stern's team, that the upcoming information and the first photographs of Pluto will be unveiled to the world. However, NASA has announced that it will use the new guidelines established by the IAU.[10]


[edit] Types of dwarf planets

Illustration of the size estimates of the largest trans-Neptunian objects including Pluto and Eris. Other objects may meet the definition of a dwarf planet.The IAU's Resolution 6a[3] recognizes Pluto as "the prototype of a new category of trans-Neptunian objects". The name and precise nature of this category are not specified, but in the debate leading up to the resolution, the members of the category were variously referred to as "Plutons" and "Plutonian objects". The former name was generally deprecated[11] and was abandoned in the final draft resolution (6b)[12]; the latter name failed to win majority approval on a 180-186 vote in the IAU General Assembly on August 24, 2006. The category, while established, remains nameless.

At an earlier stage in the definition process, the category (then described as "pluton") was defined to be a planet whose orbit took more than 200 Julian years to complete and whose orbit was more highly inclined and elliptical than a traditional planetary orbit.[13]

This category of Pluto-like objects only applies to dwarf planets which meet the conditions of being trans-Neptunian and "like Pluto" in terms of period, inclination and eccentricity. A dwarf planet may or may not be a member of this category, but all members of the category must be dwarf planets.

The membership of this class, other than Pluto itself, remains obscure. Pluto's largest satellite, Charon would qualify if it were to be classed as a dwarf planet in its own right. Eris and the objects listed in the table "Possible dwarf planets" (above) also qualify in terms of the minimum period, and most exhibit orbital eccentricity and inclination that are significant, though not always equal to or greater than Pluto's. Quaoar, however, has a much smaller eccentricity and inclination, and so possibly does not qualify as a Pluto-like object.

The diagrams below illustrate the changes between the original draft and the final outcome of the vote.