Who designed Living things...?

Question

If the answer is God ....Can u prove scientifically...If u have someother explanation reply....how can u tell that we're living things...There are chances that non living things can think that we're not living.....

Answer 1

A shitty designer apparently.

I was choking on some food earlier as it went down the wrong tube and wondered why on earth, if God exists, why he would design something that works so terribly. Couldn't this God simply have given me a seperate tube for eating and for breathing?

To me it doesn't really add up. Clearly this designer was on drugs or we have no designer. I know of no such engineer that would design things in general so poorly.

Answer 2

I have no problem tick "God". Though there can be lots of other variants.God's design could be scientifically observed in watching a leave sprouting on the tree's branch.Non livings also follow some functional and structural design. Science agrees to this . Who the designer . Hope not a scientist.

Answer 3

(1) You cannot prove scientifically that which you cannot measure. You can only prove by "definition" that what we call "God" is consistent with all other laws and systems that we also define to describe our universe.

It is like proving that 2 = the total count of this object and that object. That is how we defined "2" as a symbol for that concept.
We agreed that "2" would represent the count of two items.

So if we define "God" to mean the central source of all life,
then by definition, we are assigning "God" to mean the
collective knowledge or design or source of all creation.

If someone else's system of thought only requires a mutual respect for common "truth," or if someone only believes in the force of "life" to guide all events, then like math variables, we can take "God" to mean the equivalent of "truth" or "life" or "love" or whatever concept someone else uses to describe their world.

(2) Reverse proof
As you state, you could infer by the opposite approach. Because the "probability" of all creation arriving at its present state by chance or even by evolution, purely by survival or drive of life, would be questionable. So many harmonious factors occur simultaneously, or at different points geographically or historically without direct connection or influence, so that the evolution could not be explained as a linear process but would require such multitasking, correlated occurences, or advance planning it seems more conceivable that a master plan was already in place and the universe follows that.

Or, as I have found works well, is to start with people who question or do not believe that all people can believe in the same God or universal truth; and then work backwards from there. By asking why they don't believe this, all the examples can be explained another way, either by counterexamples that already exist, or by resolving past problems or conflicts in the future to prove that these things can be reconciled in agreement. By removing the objections that each person may have, I have found that their underlying beliefs tend toward faith in one truth.
So if all people on earth went through this process of letting go of their reasons for nonbelief in a universal God, you would have "proven" this concept in the minds of all humanity.

Again, if the only purpose of understanding the existence, purpose or proof of God is to communicate in agreement with other human beings; then the real issue is to agree on common terms for the same concepts. If all people agree to respect one another as we either seek "universal truth/wisdom/love" or worship "God as the universal source of all life and the design and purpose of creation," then we can apply that common focus toward research, resolving problems, and making decisions in life by agreement and equal respect. We should not let our words or definitions get in the way, but rather should use our words and concepts as tools to define the way, toward establishing mutal understanding and common purpose in life.

Answer 4

Designed things can be copied. The living things are not designed by anybody. They are natural. No two living things are same. Whatever we living things do, the non-living things don't do. The non-living things have no brain like us. We think therefore we are but the non-living things are there only because we think they are.

Answer 5

God create the Universe,
and 'Vedas' tells us about that,
The Universe itself is God.

Veda also says,
'Ishavasyam idam sarvam'
means, He is everywhere even in molecules,
neutron, photon everything. or u can say, molecules itself is He , or His creation

and here comes the theory of Big Bang which is universally accepted and very close to Indian philosophy.
the Sun is sources of energy, proved scientifically and hindus also believe universe is a big fire ball and explosion split energy in different sources or forces. so we , put it together, Big Ban , then, He is selfcreated so He himself divided his energy through explosion and as He is everywhere even in molecules so practically He can do that.

first , we have life in the sea, with only one cell.
then sky & than earth , i m not sure about it.
but it's like that and after centuries, humans are created .

Answer 6

living things arent designred twice their design it to show what they can do

your thunking of just a substance that destigiuisheeeeeees itself frowm others by being part of a wholee see the design makes it more than
nothing like blank solids
God would have to be right in his design because see everything when you lokk at it tells you that it could not be ther right fact right
welll whats it gonna do
it going to chang something else that shows you it could not be there right ... like doesnt eveything you use
able to go with something velse like itself...
then thats it right so thats how lines color and texture of solid which make up evrything when put together in certain order can emphasise an area of intrest to others right like you wouldnt put light on a can of spinach to open it would you.. but people ignore me
or act like i donyt make sense or they thinkk im rong

what i mean is people act like that they think im wrong

Answer 7

the answer lies within the question. can you prove it's not god? i'm not saying you're wrong or right. in a case of philosophy, you have to see both sides. doing so will open more doors of questioning. and when you can bundle them all up, you will reach enlightenment. or will you... crazy huh

Answer 8

Who are you and what have you done to this man who speaks without knowledge of the Scriptures and what Genesis says.

Answer 9

Non-living things do not think----but you knew that already didn't you?