Quote from listed source (q.v.):
"Good fossils of multi-celled animals. Ediacaran fauna (or Vendobionta) flourish worldwide in seas. Trace fossils of worm-like Trichophycus, etc. First sponges and trilobitomorphs. Enigmatic forms include oval-shaped Dickinsonia, frond-shaped Charniodiscus, and many soft-jellied creatures."
Archaebacteria were indeed the first living organisms on the planet but they are not considered animals. At the end of the Proterozoic during the Edicaran at 630 million years ago you have your first multi-cellular animals. You need to scroll down quite a bit at this link to confirm this.
2006-11-15 15:20:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Professor Armitage 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
We don't know. It was probably just an aggregate of unspecialized eukaryotic cells. Imagine a sponge or a very simple coelenterate, only a few hundred cells, if that.
2006-11-15 13:13:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know maybe Cells i didn't know the name or Bacterias especially Dinosaurs.
2006-11-15 13:50:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by DaRkAngeL XIII 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think anyone can answer this and back it up with facts.
2006-11-15 12:56:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Wibble 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
multicellular? that would be a sea sponge, cnidaria, if i am not mistaken.
2006-11-15 13:13:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bandit 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
fish
2006-11-15 12:54:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jenn 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
archaebacteria
2006-11-15 12:59:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by sam c 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
I BELIEVE THAT EVE HAD A BEAVER
2006-11-15 12:54:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by John K 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't matter.
2006-11-15 12:50:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Creatures of the sea and sky. That's wat the bible says.
2006-11-16 18:01:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by mandamandapanda 3
·
0⤊
0⤋