I'm looking directly at you, Hillary! She doesn't care how many people are killed in Iraq. She doesn't care how many human lives die due to abortion. She is a madwoman who probably gets off to the thought of innocent people dying. I'm embarrassed to live in the state that elected her to Senate!
2006-11-15 04:22:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
you are by asking stupid questions like this
2006-11-15 04:34:53 · answer #1 · answered by ChaliQ 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Democrats and Republicans are the comparable. at the back of close doorways Dems and Reps are continuously in contract. To something of the international, they act like they're against one yet another. This creates the phantasm there are 2 sides of ever difficulty. truthfully, they're the comparable difficulty. The considerable government, run by utilising bureaucratic servants called Democrats and Republicans, comprehend that there is a 11% approval cost of the government by utilising the US voters. that's unacceptable to the Dems and Reps. they choose away to coach there power. So springing up a terror environment, gets the voters interest. this will additionally enable them to portray they're doing something for the voters which could no longer be saved removed from the government. I't is a compelled acceptance of power in all its tyranny. between the policies of conflict while dealing with an greater enemy is to divide and triumph over, extremely then to attack your enemies rigidity as an entire. understanding that voters and there constitutional freedoms/rights are a thee governments superb enemy, springing up a diversionary tactic inclusive of Republican and Democrat would divide the governments enemies "voters + constitutional freedoms/rights" as quickly as divided, the enemy is a few distance much less confusing to triumph over. to that end, as quickly as we are divided, the considerable government can get rid of freedoms/rights, and enforce tyrannous rules plenty much less confusing than if we've been united. Vote for everyone else besides Democrats or Republicans. I't would be everyone commencing from a 0.33 occasion candidate to Mickey Mouse. do only no longer vote for Democrats or Republicans. They have been offered and paid for a protracted time in the past by utilising bureaucrats. while Dems or Reps are elected, they serve the pastimes of transnational companies that paid for them to get elected, no longer the voters. I't is the perfect performing out of a "stable cop undesirable cop" situation in historic past. only bear in mind. The Tea occasion is the Republican occasion. "I'f your a multi-billion dollar transnational company and you pay for, a million President + 435 Congressmen + a hundred Senators + 9 perfect courtroom Justices, then you definately've entire power over 350,000,000+ voters and all there supplies."
2016-10-15 14:12:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh come on now Hillary is just a liberal. She's not an ultra liberal. For those you have to look to John Kerry and Teddy Kennedy. Now if I were a resident of MA I'd be embarrased. Not only did they elect those two in the first place they keep doing it over and over.!
2006-11-15 04:39:14 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Funny thing is, she is a more middle of the road democrat, not amongst the most liberal by any means. She only won by 67% because she had no real competition. If Gulliani(sp?) had run against her then her victory (if she won) would have meant something significant.
2006-11-15 04:41:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Wow, she won by a frigging landslide (67%). Apparently most of the people in your state disagree with you. That you call her an ultra-liberal tells me right away you don't know what you are talking about. Hillary is not anywhere near an ultra-liberal. You sound sort of hysterical about the whole thing to tell the truth.
2006-11-15 04:30:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Oh take it easy will ya !
you think your embarrassed ??? look at the senators and majority leader in California!!!
2006-11-15 05:18:14 · answer #6 · answered by Dear Blabby 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually I'm for the war but I think it's great to see people fianally see the light where she is concerned. She has so many strikes against her but it's like everybody is afraid to bring them to light cause everybody knows what happens when you cross her! I hope more people see it before she tries to run for president.
2006-11-15 04:28:07 · answer #7 · answered by Brianne 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Go Hillary!!!!!!
She supports Bush all the way.
She will be the next president.
2006-11-15 04:34:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Almost as bad as that cowboy in the White House who doesnt care how many people are killed in Iraq either.
2006-11-15 04:24:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Hilary has bever been "an ultra-liberal" she's more of a moderate.
2006-11-15 04:33:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋