That's the way it goes. Consider sports where coming in 4th place seldom has a prize.
2006-11-15 03:52:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Plasmapuppy 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Actually, he didn't starve, he was a vegetarian, but that just didn't fit into the poem as easy so just saying he had no roast beef or "none" was simpler. Hope that clarifies for you, have a great day!
2006-11-15 11:53:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by cowboys21angel 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
He may not have been left to starve. He simply didn't get any roast beef. Perhaps he was a vegan.
2006-11-15 12:04:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
World Economics.
2006-11-15 11:53:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Snaglefritz 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because they were making a bad rhyme of "home" and "none". When I was tiny, I did not recognize the rhyme, so I felt free to rewrite the verse to go, "This little piggie had chicken". I liked chicken!
2006-11-15 11:54:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by kreevich 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The third pig was the smart one (remember the brick house ?) and would not clog his arteries eating that muck. He probably had fish instead, on a little dish, the next day when the boat came in.
Best of Luck
2006-11-15 11:56:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because the third piggy ate all the roast beef and everything else!! that piggy!!
2006-11-15 11:53:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by DONNA'S NIGHTMARE COME TRUE 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The 3rd is a pimp mack daddy and the 4th is a sucker.
2006-11-15 11:55:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lotus Phoenix 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
survival of the fittest
2006-11-15 11:52:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by midnightsteve5150 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was the next night's dinner.
2006-11-15 11:54:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by FoxyFoxy, Kickass Drama Queen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋