I am looking for a #3 WR off the wavier wire...should I get Reche Caldwell (NE) or Patrick Crayton (Dal), or are these guys one-week-wonders?
2006-11-15 03:29:47 · 12 answers · asked by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Well from what I know neither really produce anything for their teams, Crayton hardly gets a pass his way and I don't think Caldwell is a big target for Brady, basically they are both one-week wonders. Thats really what your going to find at this point in the season. Not to many players that haven't been active now will become active. But its always possible as last season both Kevin Curtis (STL) and Ernest Wilford (JAX) became second half fantasy guys. Keeps your eyes open for someone who does good for 2 weeks in a row, or who consistently is getting better. Thats your best bet, Best Wishes :-)
2006-11-15 04:36:08 · answer #1 · answered by rachelle105210 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
crayton is building chemistry with romo but if glenn comes back will see the field but hard to put up spectacular numbers as a spot wr, is chris henry available he`s a better 3rd wr option, n england with caldwell could get poor numbers as well as brady spreads the ball, henry,crayton caldwell in that order.
2006-11-15 08:20:22 · answer #2 · answered by letitbemetheone 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Caldwell is better only because he at least is a starter. Crayton is a number three and will have less chances at getting the ball.
2006-11-15 10:57:18 · answer #3 · answered by Bignizz66 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reche Caldwell. It is a Florida thing. He can't let baby brother Andre show him up this year. Florida Gator star Andre Caldwell is having his best year at Florida. Sibling rivalry got to start kicking in somewhere.
2006-11-15 05:21:56 · answer #4 · answered by Sports Maven 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Out of those two I would say that you should take Crayton. possibly take a look at a Giants reciever. Amani Toomer is out for the season, so that will give someone else the oppurtunity.
2006-11-15 04:00:49 · answer #5 · answered by Jazzy J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
picked up caldwell today, as a bench player. brady has been throwing to everybody, he just might put up some reasonable #'s. NE likes to run though too, that is one reason why i would be hesitant to start caldwell.
2006-11-15 03:33:34 · answer #6 · answered by Chrispy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This one is desperate via the tournament up. flow with Welker, Johnson and Galloway. i be attentive to Welker is hit or omit, yet Fitz remains no longer one hundred% healthful, and Welker gets lots of opportunities against the Jets. NE desires to attain every time they have the ball, and Welker has Randy Moss attracting all of the attention from the ultimate the Jets' protection has to grant, which isn't lots.
2016-12-14 07:41:51 · answer #7 · answered by zell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i personally say no to crayton
maybe caldwell
2006-11-15 03:31:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
caldwell, think glenn is back this week thats why
2006-11-15 07:46:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they both are risky
Crayton - only useful until Glenn is back
Caldwell - Pat's have way too many WR's
it depends on match-ups
2006-11-15 03:37:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋