Do you think we will see legislations seeking to infringe on our 2ns Amendment rights to keep & bear arms?
Even though there's evidence that gun bans DO NOT work in countries like Great Britain & Australia, there's many politicians who'd like to do just that - people like Pelosi, Schumer, Kennedy, and a host of others.
2006-11-15
02:06:20
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
For "BradSchuman" below, I suggest he visit: www.nraila.org.
Then type in "Britain's gunlaws" in their search window.
They'll give you statistics of crime rates skyrocketing in England & Australia due to the disarming of regular citizens.
In England, a homeowner has to try and leave the house if a robber breaks in rather than being able to defend his/her own family & property.
2006-11-18
08:06:54 ·
update #1
"OUT OF MY COLD DEAD HANDS!!" -Charlton Heston
2006-11-15 02:15:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Did you see the Family Guy episode where they showed the Founding Fathers inteneded to mean have a pair of Bear (the animal) arms on display.
ANYWAY (I just thought it was funny)...I don't see the day in the near future when they start banning guns. Maybe military issued weapons but I can't see our handguns going the way of the dodo.
And while Pelosi is RADICAL she isn't THE voice of the nation.
2006-11-15 10:10:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lotus Phoenix 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I disagree that gun control doesn't work. Having been to London on numerous occassions, i can tell you that I've been able to walk the streets passed midnight and feel perfectly safe...even in an area that's suppoed to be bad , like Portobello Road. The only ones there with guns are the police--and even THEY are only armed with "billy-clubs" most of the time.
2006-11-15 10:10:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
If Charlie Schumer has his way, they'll be driving through neighborhoods collecting privately owned firearms. Not all neighborhoods, just suburbia.
2006-11-15 10:31:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not immediately. You also didnt mention the incident in NY where someone claimed to have heard 7 shots fired...NY has a ban there too.
2006-11-15 10:09:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by paradigm_thinker 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
As a police officer, I can promise you I will not be enforcing any legislation that infringes on the 2nd Am.
2006-11-15 10:09:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by clsga 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Democrats still have to have legislation approved by the President who thankfully still has the power of veto.
2006-11-15 10:08:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by only p 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just like in any Congress, you'll probably see more talking and arguing than seeing anything (at all) get voted on.
2006-11-15 10:16:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by ahandle101 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You better buy your guns and ammo now, you won't be able to in a few years.
2006-11-15 10:08:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please like they'll take that right away. You Red-NICKS are so scared of loosing your guns. It's sad it usually you guys who shoot your wives with them.Just to let you know here in the early Americas most people didn't have guns bec. they couldn't afford them and only very few hunted with guns like the upper class who owned property!You couldn't shoot animals on rented property(even you your the renter) it was called pooching ! I don't think everyone needs a gun like those robbers!
2006-11-15 10:16:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Apple 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
No,I don't think they will touch it until after 08 if they win.
2006-11-15 10:13:39
·
answer #11
·
answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7
·
1⤊
0⤋