English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

M.P. Thompson, Modern Land Law:
"Under the Land Registration Act 2002, only legal easements will override a registered dispoistion (Land Registration Act, Sched. 1, para. 3; and Sched. 3, para 3)...... "


Land Registry Practice Guide 62 (March 2005):
"An easement (legal or equitable) expressly granted on or after 13 October 2003 over registered servient land cannot be an overriding interest".....(there is no reference for this in this practice guide however).


So is it just me, or is this contradicting?Are they, or are they not overriding interests?If they are, what is the reference for this?

Thankyou, very confused!

2006-11-15 02:04:14 · 2 answers · asked by huvgj 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

You've quoted only secondary sources. It seems the law changed on 13 Oct. 2003. You should consult the primary source; the statute that changed the law.

2006-11-15 02:09:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

the fast answer is that no longer all pastimes in land recognized by utilising regulation as requiring protection are suggested in the call deeds or Land Registry.to absolutely answer your Q you will desire to look at various issues - the version between criminal and valuable possession - criminal and equitable pastimes and all that includes.Then look on the statutes as much as and which contains LRA 2002.

2016-10-15 14:05:15 · answer #2 · answered by spurr 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers