OJ Simson going to discuss his new book..."If I did it, here's how it happened" on FOX.
excerpt from link
LOS ANGELES - Taking hypothetical to new heights, O.J. Simp.son will appear in a two-part TV special this month to reveal "how he would have" killed his ex-wife and her friend 12 years ago "if he were the one responsible," the Fox network said yesterday.
In the broadcasts, Simpson, 59, will be grilled in a "no-holds-barred interview" by Judith Regan, the publisher of his new book, "If I Did It," which hits shelves Nov. 30.
The special, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," is set to air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29 from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on Fox, the network said.
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/471610p-396760c.html
OJ is now a writer?
FOX has hit an all time low?
And the intro to the story on the local news here(KING-5) was.
"OJ Simpson is causing controversy again."
chirped by local network news twinkie.
isn't that cute?
2006-11-15 01:23:22 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I don't like the look of OJ's face.
He has been carrying that guilty look on his face for years.
Who DOESN'T believe he is guilty?
Is OJ high fiving his golf partners and laughing all the way to the bank?
And it is all for entertainment and selling advertisement?
Are Americans brains broke?
Who is going to watch this thing?
I sure won't
2006-11-15 01:30:14 · update #1
I worked in the Human Resources Dept. at a factory when the "Not Guilty" verdict was announced on the news that day. Every one of the African-American women working in the factory had their head phones on awaiting the verdict. When it was announced, everyone of those women stood up and cheered like he actually was not guilty. They behaved as if they knew him personally or something. It was so ridiculously stupid to watch such an idiotic display of ignorance. I wondered then and I wonder now; if OJ were white and the victims were black would those same women have behaved in such a way???
2006-11-15 03:27:21 · answer #1 · answered by Wiccan Woman 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I won't be watching, nor will I buy the book. How unfeeling can you be? Whether he did it or not, the families of Nicole and Ron do not deserve to have all this dredged up again in this sensational way. I thought he was guilty then, I still believe it now, and only hope that some of the money from this will finally go to pay off the judgement against him for the Goldman family and the Brown family.
I have always felt FOX has been the "National Enquirer" of TV news, this just solidifies that belief.
2006-11-15 09:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Well, Fox News owns the copy right to O.J's book, so this is simply a commercial to sell books. OJ has all but confessed to this horrible crime he committed and now he is trying to make money off of it. The problem with all these news shows is money. The more they can make, the more they will expose poor innocent people like Nicole and Ron. I pray for their families and GOD help us all.
2006-11-15 09:30:00 · answer #3 · answered by cookie 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is nuts. What the hell kind of person writes a book like that?? There's something wrong with him, either way - if he did it or if he didn't. He's mental.
2006-11-15 14:08:22 · answer #4 · answered by smartbunny 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think it's disgusting he way he's been parading around for the last, what, 9 years behaving as though he got away with murder, if you pardon the pun.
Too many details I think, and if he were offed somehow outside the judicial system, it would be a blessing the family members fo the deceased.
.
2006-11-15 11:41:58 · answer #5 · answered by twowords 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I just hope no body buys this disgusting book. If you must read it try the library.
Yes he is guilty.
2006-11-16 08:29:41 · answer #6 · answered by Marge Simpson 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
there not much the law can do to him any more so i think this is a way to pay these money sucking family memebers of his late wife back for something he may or may not have done . but oj is a long way from being broke .
2006-11-15 09:30:09 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Look, he could even go on TV and proclaim he did it and NOTHING would happen as he was already found not guilty of the crime
2006-11-15 09:25:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Somewhere, somehow, this guy's actions will catch up with him if he's guilty.
2006-11-15 12:59:54 · answer #9 · answered by Rob 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i don't want any part of it.
2006-11-16 07:02:44 · answer #10 · answered by ronzohooter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋