It's the last wicket pair in an ODI. 1 run to win. Bowler bowls one down the leg side, batsman is down the pitch. Wicketkeeper collects the ball and stumps him, appeals. The square leg umpire rules the batsman out stumped. The main umpire says its a wide ball. What's the decision of the match? Is it a tie? Or does the batting team win?
Is it one of the rare occasions when the chasing team is all-out, but still wins the match?
2006-11-15 00:59:16 · 8 answers · asked by pressurekooker 4 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Well in such situations, the match shall be awarded to the side batting 2nd. Because, when the scores are crossed then there is nothing left. You might have noticed, that in this ICCCT (ICC Champions Trophy) in the match between Australia and England, Michael Hussey hit the ball for 4 on a "No-ball" to win the match. But, only the "No-ball" was counted in the scores, because once the scores are crossed, then there nothing left in it. And also, the last wicket of the stumping shall not be awarded. So, the side batting 2nd would win the match by 1 wicket.
Rawal.
2006-11-15 05:20:20 · answer #1 · answered by Tony 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well in such situations, the match shall be awarded to the side batting 2nd. Because, when the scores are crossed then there is nothing left. You might have noticed, that in this ICCCT (ICC Champions Trophy) in the match between Australia and England, Michael Hussey hit the ball for 4 on a "No-ball" to win the match. But, only the "No-ball" was counted in the scores, because once the scores are crossed, then there nothing left in it. And also, the last wicket of the stumping shall not be awarded. So, the side batting 2nd would win the match by 1 wicket.
Firstly , a bowler bowls a wide.
A run is awarded to the batting team.
Then , the batsman gets stumped.
So , for example , if this is the situation before the last ball ,
India - 299/10
Australia - 299/9
Then ,
after the wide and stumping , it would be ,
India - 299/10
Australia - 300/10
If this is the case , then the batting team will win.
2006-11-15 06:51:13 · answer #2 · answered by Baashah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Firstly , a bowler bowls a wide.
A run is awarded to the batting team.
Then , the batsman gets stumped.
So , for example , if this is the situation before the last ball ,
India - 299/10
Australia - 299/9
Then ,
after the wide and stumping , it would be ,
India - 299/10
Australia - 300/10
If this is the case , then the batting team will win.
2006-11-15 03:19:01 · answer #3 · answered by Sajeev 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, the side batting second wins, because the wide ball is counted first. However, if there were more runs to win, then a batsman can be out stumped of a wide ball. But even in this case, one run is awarded for the wide ball.
2006-11-15 05:48:49 · answer #4 · answered by Vijay_Srini 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First the ball was wide so the team gets one run and they win but if its just a wide ball and more batsman and runs are still there then its a wide and a out.
2006-11-15 01:40:22 · answer #5 · answered by uday s 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your element would not make any experience. extensive ball is extra criminal ball in assessment to no ball. extensive ball is that ball that's meant to be out of attain of batsman. Stump-out is made so as that a batsman could play interior the crease. Coming right down to music does no longer mean that that's a guarantee to hit 6. Batsman comes forward to music to realize in the line of bowl. it is not injustice. This rule provides equivalent income to bowler and batsman. If batsman comes forward to music and tries to hit a great hit and succeeds then he gets runs. And if he fails then the bowler has a great gamble to take wicket. So remember is equalized. No ball is a unlawful transport. No ball ability the bowler has bowled without following the bowling rules. So purely run out is authorized in noball. by way of fact run continuously taken via batsman's determination, no longer bowler's determination. yet A bowler can made caught-out, Hit wicket, bowled, stump and so on via his noball. so those are actually not allowed. in case you no longer enable the bowler to stumpout on a great transport, then what's going to do the bowler. On everyball the batsman will come forward by way of fact he can't be stumpout, even to 0.5 a pitch then what's going to you do..? present rule is suited(one hundred%) and there is no longer a unmarried reason, which may make me think of that it would be amended.
2016-10-22 03:16:02 · answer #6 · answered by balderas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It can be one of the rare occasions when the chasing team is all-out, and wins the match.
2006-11-15 02:58:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
chasing team wins but they are all out.
2006-11-15 03:08:54 · answer #8 · answered by RV 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋