English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

He was in a position of RESPONSIBILITY !

He did it.
He must be held responsible for his crimes.

2006-11-15 00:59:00 · answer #1 · answered by ewan123ewan 2 · 2 1

b/c people don't understand government. They point the finger at the person who is on the news the most, or the name they know. People really don't know whats going on they just hear the opinion influenced news. News is not 100% cut and dry truth, it is based on fact with opinion of the station over-barring the fact. If you want to blame someone for this blame congress it was them who took us to war not Bush. Bush did declare war but congress had to get a 2/3s vote on it. and Rumsfeld was just put into a poor situation.

2006-11-15 09:39:44 · answer #2 · answered by joe d 4 · 0 0

because the inner snactum of western governments are compramised by world banks (the new world order) he was sacrifised ,the law suit is because of certain acts they put into place soldiers were ordered to use torture yet he says it was rogue soldiers but it is all documented ,just like the patriots act all written up and sitting on bush's desk a month before 9/11?not just your government this goes back 100 years and if people dont wake up its game over .not to far in the near future cheney will be on his way you watch!!!! watch this film if you want to see he big picture:http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230&q=terrorstorm

2006-11-15 11:03:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The man is an arrogant bully, my words? - No, the words of a retired United States General.

Memos have surfaced showing the extent of his involvement in the torture of prisoners.

The problem with the Bush Administration is that they "think" they are untouchable.

The future will answer that one, but I hope Rumsfeld has a few sleepless nights.

2006-11-15 10:38:50 · answer #4 · answered by researcher 3 · 0 1

I can tel you from personal experience that this man is a jack a** he had me thrown in a holding cell for 28 days and I was helping homeland security, all I did was disagree with him and call him a "vindictive old prick" and I refuse to work with the department of defense anymore. withing the day I was scooped up off the street and placed in a solitary room in a private hospital without a doctors exam...all in America. if he did that here I wonder what he does to his enemies abroad.

2006-11-15 09:05:01 · answer #5 · answered by yellowkayak 4 · 1 1

A German court recently issued a warrant to charge Rumsfield with the terrible abuses at Abu Gharaib and others. He was a leader, and he has got everything to do with those crimes.

2006-11-15 09:00:46 · answer #6 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 1 1

The case will never go anywhere. In the unlikely event that it did and there was proof of specific orders that violated international law, saying he himself was following orders wouldn't protect him.

2006-11-15 09:10:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are NO war crimes.. It is just the power-hukngry, terrorist-leaning liberals who hate Bush so much that they are going to strike out against anyone who he picked.. They were going to start with Rumsfield but he resigned first. Next will be either Cheney or C. Rice.. ANYTHING ANYTHING ANYTHING to show their HATE for Bush

2006-11-15 09:02:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Don was the man with the plan...What war crimes???? You mean when our troops tortured the guests in our jails??? He quit because he knew the Dems would scream and shout at him..

2006-11-15 09:04:33 · answer #9 · answered by flip103158 4 · 1 0

is donald ramsfield related to donald rumsfeld?

2006-11-15 09:24:35 · answer #10 · answered by grumpy 5 · 0 0

I never heard of a law suit, when did this happen, is it in the States?

2006-11-15 09:13:20 · answer #11 · answered by Bella Donna 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers