If you support her say so now, plz.
2006-11-15 00:06:09 · 18 answers · asked by Celeste P 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
'Well it seems that people are against women presidents and I tend to be also but in light of recent experience with our present ADMINISTRATION (?) I'm beginning to wonder if a woman president wouldn't be an answer to consider ,,,, Margret Thatcher didin't do so bad for England ,,,, So who know's ,,,, with the way things are now it probably wouldn't hurt to try ,,,, Nothing else we've done so far has done any good ,,,, So how could haveing a female president hurt any more than we've been hurt already ,,,,,
2006-11-15 00:17:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
you know the reason she is portrayed so badly in the press (in the press I say the richest and most powerful) is because she took them on and is not afraid of them. Personally I think its a sad shape of the country to see the media so slanted. If you think about it, while here husband was in office, he took away the big tax breaks that George Sr gave to the very rich to balance the budget, the economy thrived with a balanced budget, But Clinton made allot of enemies among the rich doing that and we saw what happened,, investigating things that never would have been investigated before and has been done before by most in power, They find unhappy and misguided people and tell them Clinton and the liberals are why they are so unhappy and because they are unhappy and misguided, they believe it. You have to remember that Clinton won by large numbers and I personally know many many middle of the road intelligent republicans who voted for him and thought he did what was best for the vast majority of Americans. I think if you ask the vast majority of Americans they will tell you life was much better back then. Its sad to see how brainwashed people can get, Look at how in the media, how liberals are presented in a negitve way now, this is all new how they are protrayed in todays media. The #1 thing the FAR RIGHT not normal republicans, do is discredit anyone who goes against what they want or goes against what the very very rich want.. Good luck Hillary
2006-11-15 00:39:51 · answer #2 · answered by Jon J 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I do support her. I think that right now she is the best candidate for 2008. A lot can change in two years, and we've yet to hear her national platform, but what I know of her politics right now convinces me to cautiously support her. Those who say she is too liberal don't know jack about her. I think because she is pro-choice and possibly same-sex marriage friendly they automatically shove her into liberal status. That is very foolish. She is really pretty moderate on most issues, and she's a hawk to boot. A woman who isn't hawkish will never sit in the Oval Office. Especially in this world atmosphere. If I thought she was afraid to use military power I wouldn't even consider her. No, I don't advocate war for war's sake, but in today's world we may be militarily involved somewhere on a regular basis and we need a President who can deal with that. I believe that she can, and I also believe she will exhaust diplomacy before doing so.
Ignore the ad homenim attacks on her. It's all the Clinton Harpies have to attack her with, and it shows their lack of intelligence.
2006-11-15 02:48:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wish her well in her retirement only. She has no useful place in politics, social issues, health care reform, or any other aspect of local, state, or federal government. I believe she would make a great mortuary usher, possibly a satisfactory 24-hour convenience store attendant, librarian, or manager at the waffle house.
Sure, I wish her well with that.
2006-11-15 14:13:47 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes!. She could not be any worse than some of our male presidents. I would love to give her a chance and see if a woman would make a difference.
2006-11-15 00:18:48 · answer #5 · answered by Bella Donna 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I favor Hillary nicely so she will be able to respond to questions about what she knew or perhaps as she knew it. that is honest to ask your self if Hillary needed Vince Foster nicely. perhaps she does not deserve anyones sympathy.
2016-11-29 04:01:02 · answer #6 · answered by mrotek 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is a brilliant woman with great ideas.
It's time for a woman President that will lead us into the future.
2006-11-15 01:04:19 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
To be honest, I don't really see Hil as standinga chance to become president, especially if she decides to run with Obama.
2006-11-15 00:16:33 · answer #8 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No!! unless you agree with her statement in her book, that the sate is better capable of raising children than parents.
2006-11-15 02:18:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yup
2006-11-15 00:11:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋