I think he was more a bomber than a terrorist. But he could be considered both.
2006-11-14 23:52:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kristen H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was just an unstable bomber who had a beef with the government. I have no sympathy for him as he killed a lot of innocent children with his idiocy. If he had to bomb a government facility he should have picked one without a day care center in it.
2006-11-15 10:01:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by c321arty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure there is a point you are trying to make, but I can't help you make it.
If you could go back in time and prevent McVeigh from his actions, by preemptive means, wouldn't you?
2006-11-15 07:53:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither, he had nothing to do with it and when people start realizing stuff like this then perhaps we can get on with our lives. See "Arlington Road" movie w/Jeff Bridges & Tim Robbins and you'll get my drift. good luck.
2006-11-15 07:53:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither ,he was a scapegoat !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh
http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/notorious/mcveigh/dawning_1.html
2006-11-15 08:09:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by nice guy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋