2006-11-14 23:50:13 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think he was more a bomber than a terrorist. But he could be considered both.
2006-11-14 23:52:47 · answer #1 · answered by Kristen H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was just an unstable bomber who had a beef with the government. I have no sympathy for him as he killed a lot of innocent children with his idiocy. If he had to bomb a government facility he should have picked one without a day care center in it.
2006-11-15 10:01:00 · answer #2 · answered by c321arty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure there is a point you are trying to make, but I can't help you make it.
If you could go back in time and prevent McVeigh from his actions, by preemptive means, wouldn't you?
2006-11-15 07:53:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, he had nothing to do with it and when people start realizing stuff like this then perhaps we can get on with our lives. See "Arlington Road" movie w/Jeff Bridges & Tim Robbins and you'll get my drift. good luck.
2006-11-15 07:53:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither ,he was a scapegoat !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh
http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/notorious/mcveigh/dawning_1.html
2006-11-15 08:09:14 · answer #5 · answered by nice guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋