We call it 'climate change', a nice and media friendly term
Do you think that if we called it:
Climate you-are-all-going-to-die-if-your-don't-change
People would pay a bit more attention to it?
Damn politicians
2006-11-14 21:19:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
it ate the rest of it..
you -are all going to die if you don't change...is what is should have said!
2006-11-14 21:29:25 · update #1
They probably wouldn't.....you're right about politicians, Ichi. It's nice to know that they're crazy everywhere!
2006-11-14 21:28:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think we would still die nevertheless.
You also have to note that they are a lot of people in the world that can't handle certain information. The title means a lot. It should be clear to the point and with some sort of force to it but... not cause unwanted chaos or alarm.
People can be quite taken on by words rather than facts. Remember how the stocks plummeted when the discovered Dolly (the clone sheep) had arthritis..
People have got to sharpen themshelves too. Not just the politicans. Gotta know your facts and act on it.
2006-11-15 05:55:22 · answer #2 · answered by Aquamarine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everywhere mankind treads there is littering and abuse, just look at how we are now littering space with our bits of tin cans and spent fuel, we are all going to die anyway, it's just a case of how much we accelerate that and the legacy we pass down. Humankind is known for it's need to populate and regenerate, not too dissimilar from lesser known organisms on a Petra plate. I think it's going to take a major catastrophe or near wipe out for all our philosophies to be rewritten and re-thought, perhaps this time around with a view to respecting and nurturing our surroundings...just a thought.
2006-11-15 05:43:44 · answer #3 · answered by mizzsquitz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're in a seriousish mood today. Anyhoo, no, I don't think it would make a blind bit of difference.
I generally think giving something a blanket-title actually takes away the impact of it. Like, "human rights", "anti-social", "terrorism", "WMD" and the like. Once you give something a buzz word, it immediately gets used in the wrong context. Also, it gets used so often that people just stop registering it altogether.
2006-11-15 07:32:08 · answer #4 · answered by people are scum 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't think it would make any difference. Look what the Surgeon General's warning has done for cigarettes ... absolutely nothing!
People would have to actually care about the issue personally before they pay any attention to it, let alone act on it.
2006-11-15 05:43:16 · answer #5 · answered by S&S 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I dont think it would make differene what you call its the atitude people have got towards...like we are all going to die some day or i wont be around when it happens is the problem!
2006-11-15 05:30:20 · answer #6 · answered by Leah 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. People don't pay attention to anything unless it directly affects them.
Or if somehow they can interfere and or inconvenience someone else. You know the type.
2006-11-15 05:27:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
climate change is almost the same as global warming doofis....now use your brain n think-who likes global warming???not me...and if you do-you're and idiot..
btw:how old are you???those words i use may not be nice coz im only 19 n if ur older than me,u should probably ignore that.
2006-11-15 05:27:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think people are like ostrich's with their heads in the sand, we never really pay much attention to anything unless it effects right at the moment in our life's.. But maybe your idea would work..
2006-11-15 05:26:34 · answer #9 · answered by Lorene 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I look forward to global warming, I'm freezing up here this morning
2006-11-15 07:25:18 · answer #10 · answered by Wiley 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋