He kills two people in cold blood, brags about the crime to friends and on T.V. Then, in grizzly detail describes the murder in a book entitled "If I did It". If find this an indicting example of the failure of the justice system in the U.S., a lot than perfect of a country that wants to teach justice to the whole world. Do you agree?.
2006-11-14 16:40:28 · 9 answers · asked by seek_fulfill 4 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I think the "Double Jeopardy" part of the law is so stupid. A person can actually admit he did the crime, brag about, write a book about it and make money, and no one can do one thing about it; once the jury has an innocent verdict. It seems like a lot of the time, the law is made to protect the criminal and it is so ridiculous. Where I live there was a guy who shot a policeman in 1993. They caught the guy In 1997, and dismissed the case, cause people said they were coerced into saying things.
The guy thumbed his nose at the wife of the cop, who was pregnant at the time he died, and she had another child. He was a complete jerk, useless animal, and now he is living free.
2006-11-14 16:50:23 · answer #1 · answered by pixles 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Profit??? If anything, his endoresements have taken a dive! He used to make movies and now all he can do is write a book. In the sports cards market, you'd expect to see autographs from the great OJ, but they won't deal with him. I think he's just sick of the media and others out there challenging him in that he did actually do it, the book snaps back at those who snap at him. A jury found him Not Guilty and we are all entitled to our opinions.! A jury found Martha Stewart guilty, yet she still continues to rake in the $$$$$. ....so how is this any different?
2006-11-14 16:53:33 · answer #2 · answered by phoozball 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
anybody believes he did it and maximum have been taken aback while he grew to become into released as no longer responsible. protection placed sufficient doubt interior the techniques of the jury i assume. yet the two way he could desire to be living the existence from hell as there is in all likelihood no longer a single human being available who sees or treats him like he's harmless. He gets no longer something out of his placed up activities celeb prestige through this and that i'm useful he is going broke. No money, no kin, no admire = no longer lots of a existence.
2016-12-17 10:19:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether you believe he did it or not. My belief is that he is not profiting from the crime but from the publicity that the american media so readily gave him during the trial. Remember he was a football player before all of this and he still does have to make a living.
2006-11-14 16:43:43 · answer #4 · answered by Jeremy T 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People who can afford to pay fancy high priced lawyers do get away with Murder. ..But the statuate of limitations never runs out on murder. So He can be charged again later....(ps.)I thought all along that he did it.-he didnt seem to sad that his x wife was killed--
2006-11-14 17:15:06 · answer #5 · answered by ole_lady_93 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly it was a travesty of justice, but would you prefer that our system of justice was like Hussein's? No questions asked, just shoot them in the back?
2006-11-14 16:44:05 · answer #6 · answered by Clarkie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it speaks to our sick attraction to famous people, and how we put fame in place of por Countrys laws...
2006-11-14 16:43:17 · answer #7 · answered by LENNON3804 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OJ is totally old school. Get over it and drink milk instead.
2006-11-14 16:42:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
hummmm.....I gotta get that book.
2006-11-14 16:43:51 · answer #9 · answered by Diamond in the Rough 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋