2006-11-14 16:14:33 · 25 answers · asked by Cory W 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I assume so.
2006-11-16 23:53:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I sure do. He was insanely jealous, violent & a stalker. If that doesn't describe a murderer I don't know what does. As for the glove, I've read that OJ suffers from arthritis & I know from experience arthritis causes swelling. Let's not forget the "chase" & his wanting to commit suicide. Not something an innocent man would do.
The prosecution did an incompetent job & he had a damn good lawyer. Also, many people just couldn't believe that their "hero" would do such a thing & I suspect that the jurors gave weight to whatever fit what they wanted to hear.
2006-11-14 18:52:27 · answer #2 · answered by Judith 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world may never know and who cares, leave the bro alone why don't you ask about the Ramsey's you people always have something to say about the brother man question the other man for a change, I'm not a racists but every time black people do something it never goes away but when Am. whites do something it's an honest mistake!!!!!!
2006-11-14 16:27:06 · answer #3 · answered by Mrs. Butler ♥2 B♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so, however as you know he was found not guilty. I think the gloves they presented in court, and they did not fit....made the jury not sure.
Altho, the did find him guilty in the other court, so he had to pay money.
Think some how, he got out of that also.
2006-11-14 16:26:46 · answer #4 · answered by Eve 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt but the jury went against it (probably due to fear of race riots). Yep, he was one sick POS (right next to Ted Bundy!)
2015-10-22 10:28:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No doubt about it. It is funny how justice is applied in the U.S. Something must be terribly wrong with this so-called great country.
2006-11-14 16:45:59 · answer #6 · answered by seek_fulfill 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Innocent until proven guilty.
2006-11-14 16:16:41 · answer #7 · answered by setter505 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If anyone knew for sure whether he did or not using sensible evidence,there wouldn't have been a court hearing.
2006-11-14 16:23:11 · answer #8 · answered by some guy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2006-11-14 16:15:55 · answer #9 · answered by Marti M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jury said no, but the evidence said yes. YES
2006-11-14 16:15:52 · answer #10 · answered by mrcarl92807 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. It was Lando Calrissian.
2006-11-14 16:20:20 · answer #11 · answered by TrainerMan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋