2006-11-14 16:01:49 · 11 answers · asked by sammy j 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Democrats can now do the amendments because they are in control of the Congress.
2006-11-14 16:13:03 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. it particularly is discrimination in accordance with gender and sexual orientation. If non secular people have carry united stateson the subject of the sanctity of marriage, then the government could in simple terms end recognizing marriages altogether because it violates the liberty of religion clause of the 1st modification. consistent with threat the government could purely understand civil unions; married couples could be legally called "with politeness united." Then the non secular people can save their illusions on the subject of the sanctity of marriage, and we don't could institutionalize discrimination into our criminal code.
2016-10-22 02:56:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Normally I don;t respond to questions like this, but this got a real snicker out of me.
It just struck me as so ludicrous and hysterical
2006-11-14 16:13:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Might not be a bad idea. Even if the ban was only temporary, it would give them an idea of how it feels.
2006-11-14 16:06:09 · answer #4 · answered by Angelsativa 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is by far the DUMBEST question on yahoo answers.
Should we BAN democrat marriage??
Should we ban Gay marriage??...ooooppss!!! I thought you dems were too touchy feely for a ban ANY kind of marriage.
Should we ban marriage to underage children??
Should we ban marriage to beasts??
this is about your mentality!!!!
2006-11-14 16:08:51 · answer #5 · answered by jamocha 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
what are you 5?
seriously kiddo, grow up, your questions amused me in the beginning now there tedious dull and over used.
for the hell of it
would the same bill legalize pedophile marriages for the NAMBLA supporting liberals?
2006-11-14 16:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
nah let em get married -- spaying and neutering should be mandatory though. poor messed up kids. watch jesus camp and be very scared.
2006-11-14 16:10:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
So, this is Rosie O'Donnell's yahoo screen name!!!
2006-11-14 17:09:04 · answer #8 · answered by Supercell 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
haha so true. Republicans ruin my family values, that's for sure.
2006-11-14 16:10:23 · answer #9 · answered by Jonny Propaganda 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They shouldn't be allowed to reproduce either. Not that any of them know how to f**k anyways.
2006-11-14 16:04:25 · answer #10 · answered by Good Times, Happy Times... 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋