is ionization energy the same as electron energy?

Question

Energy required to remove an electron from a neutral atom is the atoms electron affinity or electron energy

Answer 1

you mean the kinetic energy of the electron? if so.. the answer is yes, they are the same.

Ionization energy is the same as the kinetic energy of the electron..

if you want to prove it, just use borh's model of the atom and you will see that it is true...

Answer 2

i think so??..
The energy needed to remove one or more electrons from a neutral atom to form a positively charged ion is a physical property that influences the chemical behavior of the atom. By definition, the first ionization energy of an element is the energy needed to remove the outermost, or highest energy, electron from a neutral atom in the gas phase.

thats what i got for electron energy..

Answer 3

Ionization is the energy required to remove an electron from an atom. The electronegativity is the ability of an atom to pull on its electrons.
Of course, the more electronegative an atom is, the more energy it will require to be ionized.

Answer 4

you want to study this, because is is an extremely without delay ahead exam question, concerning to both of sessions 2 or 3 specially. that's probable defined in in spite of textual content e book you're utilizing too. The txt e book has the great factor about pictures. yet in case you fairly imagine a textual content really description through a complete stranger from Thailand is better than your nicely written, proofed, printed and revered textual content e book, then right here is going... between 8 and 9 (N and O) Nitrogen has the digital configuration 1S2 2S2 2P3 Oxygen has 1S2 2S2 2P4 concentrating on the 2P orbitals, there are 3 of them proper? so each and each and every can carry 2 electrons. 2 electrons, both adverse gained't bypass into a similar orbital except they could (repulsion of the harmful can charge) So for nitrogen, they bypass one into each and each and every orbital (imagine image 3 lines each and each and every bearing one up arrow). For oxygen, with the further electron, there is nowhere to bypass, except to percentage an already occupied orbital. Squeezing the electron in expenses power, bcoz the repulsion could be triumph over. Getting an electron out (ionisation), is going to be more convenient, because the electron is being 'pushed' out, so the decrease in ionisation power on your diagram. This repulsion power replaced into said as the 'pairing power' to be triumph over through Pauling. After oxygen, the overall variety of increasing ionisation power maintains, alongside a sparkling slope, bcoz each and each and every next electron has a pairing power of its personal. wish you may follow my clumsy description. If it facilitates, you would imagine an enigmatically handsome chemistry professor waving his fingers about, even as speaking excitedly about ionisation and pairing energies, putting forward such issues as "now, that is somthing fairly interesting..."

Answer 5

Yes it is, in a way.