A. Don't have bills of rights.
b. can't be amended
c. are much longer.
2006-11-14 11:10:13 · 6 answers · asked by Deborah G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
A. of course.
Not to mention the fact that state constitutions cannot override the federal constitution and they are binding only to the state they're written in. The best they can do is expand the rights of its citizens and protect their interests.
2006-11-14 11:18:48 · answer #1 · answered by tagi_65 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
D. What is the difference?
A majority of people in both nation and state now believe that every level of government is corrupt. So why keep debating the finest points and acting like we have right to be at war over democracy. It seems we understand what democracy is, but how well are we doing in the center of our cities and even our suburbs. Give your head a shake..
I am from the western world. I was born and raised to follow the example of a man named jesus, and came to learn of others to also emulate like gandhi, martin luther king, kenndy, sister tersesa and while there are many more I have found all too few.
I know business and markets and economics, even sales and transition management. I have walked among for a long time and frankly, right now, I am just about fed up with most people.
But I am especially sympathethic to all of those who are being led down the garden path, so while I may not be politically correct I am not targetting any in particular but certainly most of you.
2006-11-14 11:41:23 · answer #2 · answered by richardnattress 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
My answer is C.
Of course state constitutions have Bills of Rights.
2006-11-14 11:28:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
D can't be amended
2014-10-31 02:53:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
my answer is A.
Are much larger
2014-09-23 13:17:16 · answer #5 · answered by Penny Niederklopfer 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A, i assume.
2006-11-14 11:12:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋