I've seen him in other films, he is such a good actor and I reckon if Ian Flemming had to choose an actr to play 007, Craig would be it? Nuff Respect to Sean Connery, but for James Bond in the 21st century, Craig is yer man! Sorry Brosnan!
2006-11-14 11:08:07 · 25 answers · asked by Proinsias 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I believe Daniel will portray a more grittier portrayal and more closer to Ian Flemming's creation he is a great actor . To those who only comment on his looks how many secret agents really have amazing features its a nice change for Bond to look more like the boy next door.
2006-11-15 02:08:46 · answer #1 · answered by jack lewis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry but Daniel Craig is blond and doesn't look the part at all. Pierce and Sean Connery had the smooth factor- Craig is a bit too much like the boy next door instead of the stud of the century.
2006-11-14 11:16:23 · answer #2 · answered by Grace 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You've definitely got to be joking, he looks nothing like " A James Bond ". I reckon he'll be no better than Tim Dalton, there have only ever been two decent James Bond's. Sean Connery and Pearce Brosnan !!!!!
2006-11-14 11:25:26 · answer #3 · answered by Sierra One 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but it sounds pretty foolish to dub someone the "best Bond yet" before you even see the film.
I mean, I'd have never chosen Connery to play Bond if the first film I'd seen him in was Zardoz, know what I mean?
Wait to see Craig in context. He very well may be "James Bond in the 21st century", but you gotta see how he does in the role first.
Best to you.
2006-11-14 11:11:50 · answer #4 · answered by Timothy W 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly,in accordance to me,it may get 9 out of 10. the hot bond Craig has complete properly interior the action picture and the stunt sequences,sound outcomes and digital camera have been dealt with excellently,however the screenplay fails to grant fringe of the seat entertainment and suspense like the faster bond video clips.the scene wherein bond is being tortured,case in point,comprises an end which fails to fulfill the visitors.besides, the action picture is properly easily worth the money.it particularly is rather comprehensible and properly worth viewing.
2016-10-03 23:25:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a little premature, since you haven't seen him as Bond yet.
It also depends a lot on the writers. Case in point - Roger Moore was great in his role in the Saint t.v. series, but not as Bond.
He's going to be a good Bond. But better than Connery or Lazenby, have to wait.
2006-11-14 11:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by Luken 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd agree. Bond is a ruthless and cold killer. That's what he does and all though I like the tongue in cheek humour of Moore and the swav gait of Connery I think Craig should do the job. As it was descirbed in the book!!
2006-11-14 21:53:10 · answer #7 · answered by KC 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're obviously a Daniel Craig fan, but i think you'll need to see the film before you can judge whether or not hes the best - its not fair to the other Bonds if you haven't based your opinion fairly.
2006-11-14 21:44:57 · answer #8 · answered by Vix 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I rekon it will take a bit for everyone to reanise him as the new bond..but from what i see and hear its fresh and has that extra umph to revive the legend of bond. I think he will become a good bond an a favorite with the ladies. He has might vote for that....but Ill wait till I see it for myself first before I say that for definate. But from what I hear its good
Claire x
2006-11-14 22:56:40 · answer #9 · answered by darbys_babbs 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apart from the Bond movies he did, there is no-one quite like Sean Connery I'm afraid. I have NEVER seem a sh#tty movie with him in it!!
2006-11-15 21:09:09 · answer #10 · answered by dragonfly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋