2006-11-14 10:59:30 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't know. I think both would be good. New York sure is blessed with a bunch of good politicians at this time in history. In addition to Clinton and Guiliani they also have Pataki, Schumer and Bloomberg. None of them are off-the-wall nuts and stay near the center which NY voters like.
Any of these people would be so much better than Boy George.
2006-11-14 11:29:24 · answer #1 · answered by noils 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd go with Giuliani. He showed great leadership in times of crisis. I consider Hillary Clinton a scallawag...from the south and moved north to capitalize and cash in.
2006-11-14 19:04:53 · answer #2 · answered by northernbornsoutherner 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Giuliani!
Hillary Sucks!
2006-11-14 19:00:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Giuliani would make a very good President.
Clinton would be a very bad President.
2006-11-14 19:05:21 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
None of the above, both parties will put forth much better candidates by the time 08 rolls around.
2006-11-14 19:14:23 · answer #5 · answered by daydoom 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Giuliani. He will have my vote. And if not him, I'll vote for anybody without the name Clinton.
2006-11-14 19:06:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Rudy is a great man, but the Republicans would never nominate someone that is pro-choice, as he is.
There are better candidates out there in both parties.
2006-11-14 19:06:55 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary!
Giuliani sucks!
2006-11-14 19:01:35 · answer #8 · answered by Phil S 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Hillary....Rudy has too many skeletons in his closet. Truth be told, its unlikely either of them will get the nomination, so this is a moot point.
2006-11-14 19:35:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
anybody would make a better president than giuliana all he knows how to do is get on tv and run his mouth and get camera time
2006-11-14 19:37:58 · answer #10 · answered by roy40372 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋