plum pudding
by thomson
2006-11-14 11:40:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by kihela 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there's a classical and a quantum way of explaining this. If the electron have been sitting nevertheless at a undeniable distance faraway from the nucleus, then the coulomb tension could pull the electron into the nucleus. because of the fact the electron is shifting with a given velocity, call it V, then the coloumb tension reasons centripetal acceleration in direction of the nucleus. Please be conscious: in centrifugal action there is not any centripetal velocity, purely acceleration. hence, this mix of the tangential velocity and centripetal acceleration reasons the electron to orbit around the nucleus. additionally, evaluate the p-orbital in an atom. If we resolve schrodinger's one million-D equation for the n = 2 orbital, we come across that the electron is authorized to exist everywhere different than very on the area of the nucleus or very some distance faraway from it (on the top of the orbital radius). even nonetheless it incredibly is barely the single dimensional equation. in case you may resolve the single million-D schrodinger equation for n=one million, or to your hydrogen atom as an occasion, we come across that the electron can exist everywhere different than the top of the orbital radius. So from the outcome it may look that the electron is unquestionably allowed to head nearer and nearer to the nucleus. it incredibly isn't the case because of the fact the waveform for the n = one million answer facilitates the electron to exist in a hollow sphere, or a 2-manifold. in case you have been to unravel the three-D schrodinger equation for n = one million, then you could get a wave type corresponding to the answer for one million-D at n=2; in different words in case you resolve the three-D equation, you may discover that the possibility of finding the electron as you physique of techniques the nucleus decreases to 0 exponentially.
2016-12-17 10:09:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by nichelle 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i believe its D. But instead of plum pubbing model its the Raisin bun model
2006-11-14 10:58:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by gordon_benbow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the answer is "A", after the gold foil experiment he conclude the atoms consisted of very tiny nuclei and since most atoms were electrically neutral he concluded electrons were embedded inside nuclei.
2006-11-14 10:52:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by lennier61 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
plum pudding
2006-11-14 10:51:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Russel 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think A, but I'm not certain.
Know anything about Bohr?
2006-11-14 10:48:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by meg s 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
B
2006-11-14 10:58:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by producer_vortex 6
·
0⤊
0⤋