English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

No, Connery definitely was the mack grand daddy of 'em all.

But as for all of the Bonds, what has made them each successful in their roles is that they brought their own touch to the role.

Daniel Craig is definitely charming and good looking and has a knack for playing characters that are a bit ruthless not to mention something of a bastard. I am VERY interested to see how he brings it all together.

You know, the day they announced he was to be the new Bond I nearly lost it. Why? Because he just didn't seem to fit the type? But then I realized that he was EXACTLY the type. Why? Because James Bond is all about being the type and the anti-type all at once.

You know that it all looks good on the surface but that there is something about him that isn't quite what it appears to be. He intrigues you...draws you in. But no matter how hard you try, you never get to know all his secrets. If you're lucky he'll give you a taste, a sample. And I think Craig has got that quality about him. I can't wait to find out if I'm wrong or I'm right!




Oh, the answer to who was a Bond girl twice is Maud Adams. She WAS a trip wasn't she?

2006-11-14 10:49:45 · answer #1 · answered by Dhara 6 · 17 0

whilst Ian Fleming wrote on line casino Royal. James Bond became into presented as 007 he became into lean, dark haired and elderly 40 two. defined as captivating yet with a rapid temper and a merciless streak. collectively as Sean Connery seems extra like him Daniel Craig portrays him much extra as Ian Fleming meant him to be. This action picture is extra gritty and real looking than maximum human beings of the others.

2016-10-17 07:08:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nope. Bond has to have the polished look of a man who went to an elite private school as a boy. Daniel Craig is a little coarse--more like your average working class guy. But time will tell if audiences share my thoughts.
Don't get me wrong--Craig is a fine actor--but I can't see him in the role any more than Tom Hanks was the right actor for "The DaVinci Code." Wrong casting there, too, IMHO.

2006-11-14 14:12:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I don't think you can answer the question until you see the movie. Lots of people have problems with a blonde Bond, who cares that much about hair color. Right now Connery is the best Bond!

2006-11-14 10:13:12 · answer #4 · answered by rdmep 1 · 4 2

No way! The best and only Bond is Sean Connery. Nobody can top him!

2006-11-14 10:12:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

No, he cannot. But, I am willing to give him his chance. Pierce comes close, but Sean will ALWAYS be Bond, James, Bond!

2006-11-14 11:33:19 · answer #6 · answered by Silly me 4 · 3 2

I dont know, itll be tough to top sean connery, but from the previews this one looks like one of the best

2006-11-14 10:12:57 · answer #7 · answered by bob john 1 · 4 2

No, I don't think he even looks like a Jamas Bond.

2006-11-14 10:07:45 · answer #8 · answered by greylady 6 · 3 2

No. No one will ever match Connery. No one. I wish him well however, and have high hopes that he will be second best.

2006-11-14 10:05:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

ummm no... nto at all... not even by a bit...

I think Pierce Brosman is teh best but thats just me

2006-11-14 10:44:23 · answer #10 · answered by bobbynamdarrwh 3 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers