English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is the british contribution causing problems and how?

2006-11-14 09:23:14 · 9 answers · asked by brienna 1 in News & Events Current Events

9 answers

All war is problematic.
This one is illegal
And has not served any purpose
Sectarian killing is out of hand
Pointless deaths
pointless exercise
Lasting legacy of shame.
We have done nothing to be proud of
No WMDs
No peace
No point

2006-11-14 09:32:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm surprised that you need to ask the question considering we are bombarded each night on the TV news with stories of death and destruction from Iraq.

The fact of the matter is we should not be there, the reasons poodle Blair gave for going to war turned out to be lies.
He has lost his popularity and has caused a great deal of harm to this country with lawless Muslims militant terrorist blowing things up and seeking to kill ordinary British citizens.. None of this would have happened if BUSH and BLAIR had kept their meddling noses out others peoples business. We are paying the price and will continue to pay the price for many years to come.

British and American soldiers are seen has an occupying force,.The original plan was to kick Saddam out and all the Iraqi peoples would be so grateful they would transition to a new government within weeks. That didn't happen because factions within the Iraqi people started to get greedy, they also took revenge on those who they saw had oppressed them.. Soldiers no matter how good or how willing to help are obvious targets,.

Its too late now to pull troops out because the terrible mes that would follow doesn't bare thinking about. so what we started we have to finish...

2006-11-16 05:02:49 · answer #2 · answered by robert x 7 · 0 0

Same as the American involvement. There are major social problems in Iraq, with heavy sectarian conflict. If you try to put a policeman into a kennel full of angry rottweilers they are going to get mauled.

At least Saddam H kept some control... :-(

2006-11-14 17:34:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If it is as you say 'England's participation', then obviously the Scots, Irish and us Welsh would consider it a problem, because we shouldn't be there! Never confuse English with British!

2006-11-14 17:37:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

if they put it to the country we would not be there. The British public do not want it and the American public dont want it.

Blair and Bush are war mongers.
dont vote Labour next time

2006-11-16 05:29:23 · answer #5 · answered by yahooisawastofspaceremoveme 3 · 0 0

Britain should have stayed out like the French and Germans.

2006-11-15 00:21:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because England has a duty protect an ex colony not fight or destroy it

2006-11-15 03:42:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the brittish are not very well liked in Iraq, this goes way back to the ottman empire

2006-11-14 19:34:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because they entered it illegally.

2006-11-14 17:34:03 · answer #9 · answered by Low profile 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers