if a document is signed in front of a notary does it mean that the contract is exactly as it reads or?

Question

when getting to court the judge can say what the contract means to say is........
on my one year lease the owner put me as the leasor and herself as the leasee. she is trying to evict and wont accept payment so should i take her to court. i tried to tell her from the begining it was incorrect but she ignored me so i signed the lease. going by the lease as it reads she owes me $2000.00 per month and is currently behind. will this hold up in court. she is doing an illegal eviction anyway.

Answer 1

Contracts are suppose to be as you understand them to be. Meaning, the definition of words often come into play when matters are taken to court, and understanding it factors in. That's what the courts are to determine. Note: It's not about who's right and who's wrong, or even if it's a truth or a lie, It's ONLY about what the law is and how it can be applied. The tables could be turned on you by asking why you signed the contract then? Focus more on the illegal eviction and gather your evidence, you've got to have evidence, instead of the error in the lease. After all she can always prove she owns the property right? Find out if she's even renting a legal or illegal unit as well. Search her name and business name in the Superior Courts to see if she's evicted anyone else, check her pattern out. Find out if she actually owns the property too, maybe it's it someone elses name.....should be public record. You might want to consider, if she accepts your rent payment, to write "paid under protest" in the notation area or something like that. Keep in mind that she can lie when this goes to court too and if you told her something or asked for repairs and they were denied, do you have proof of that? Becasue you have this contract with her and you're suppose to abide by the rules right? Well, that also means that she's got a contract with you and she's suppose to abide by those rules just the same. If she's not honoring the contract, it could help.

There are also a lot of eviction defense lawyers that can offer free services, free advice. The courts may offer this too, somewhere to go at the court house and they look at your papers and tell you what you have and don't have. They'll tell you what to do but they won't do it for you.

Answer 2

The top objective of a notary is to attest that the individuals who sign a checklist are who they say they are (via identity). The notary has no criminal duty to make particular a checklist's contents. Notarization does no longer “legalize” or “validate” a checklist. You signed and your settlement is a settlement. it may be as much as a decide to settle on no count if or no longer you owe the money. An lawyer ought to help you argue, possibly effectively, which you signed decrease than duress or weren't conscious of what you have been signing (perplexing for a layperson to attitude that perspective in courtroom). you will land up paying greater for an lawyer than $780. in case you surely sense you mustn't pay him this money and he sues, you will ought to hammer it out in courtroom.

Answer 3

haha... wish i had that problem...

Listen, best battle the illegal eviction first... don't try to use this to make money (although I'd be tempted to do the same). A notary is only confirming that the person signing the document is who they say they are. They aren't lawyers. :)

Answer 4

Signing before a notary simply indicates that the signers provided proof that they were who they said they were (driver's license, other photo i.d., etc.). It establishes nothing about the truth or correctness of the document signed.