Do you agree, in America that you are guilty till proven innocent?

Question

If you are innocent until proven guilty as the law says, why do they arrest you, put you in jail, release you on bail or bond? Or, if you can't put up bail you have to remain in jail? Why? Isn't a person innocent until proven guilty? The courts and those who make the laws are corrupt? Agree or disagree?

Answer 1

It doesn't seem fair to have to pay bail or sit in jail, but the people who are required to pay bail are the ones the court thinks will not show up for trial. Bail is not a punishment, only an incentive to show up to court at the appointed time. The jail time between the arrest and court hearing is just to ensure that you will be in court. For minor events such as traffic violations, most people show up for those hearings so bail is generally not required and they deal with the minority who don't on a case by case basis.

Answer 2

No you are innocent until proven guilty.

It's a legal concept. You are innocent in court until the government presents it case and the judge or jury finds you guilty.

When they arrest you they to have probable cause. That is they must have a reason to arrest you. The bail or bond is the way you get out of jail while waiting for your court date, in return you promise to show up, if you don't you forfeit your bond.

Now if you were guilty until proven innocent here's how it would work, prove you didn't kill Hoffa. It would be up to you then to prove that you couldn't possible kill Hoffa, or find out who did and turn that evidence to the police.

Can the courts and those who make the laws be corrupt. Yes then can but most are honest.

Answer 3

In America, you are generally innocent until proven guilty, and even innocent after that if the media says so.

The usual exceptions to the rule are in cases of police brutality, medical malpractice, and allegations of child abuse, particularly if the accused is a priest or a republican.

The super exception to the rule is in the case of politicians or lawyers, who are guilty without even being charged with anything.

Answer 4

I don't believe it is like that and never has been. I have to agree with you. If someone believes you have created a problem or commited a crime they do tote you off to jail. But have you also thought about that at one time it may not have been that way but people ran and they could not find them so that is why they sit up the system like that so they could keep up with the criminals. Of course the legal system is corrupt they make laws and pass them so they can break them and throw everybody else in jail for them

Answer 5

In order to operate, the legal system has to be able to prevent re-offending or absconding while you are waiting for a trial. It is reasonable to release you with conditions, or hold you if the evidence suggests you might re-offend.

You are not considered guilty DURING YOUR TRIAL. That's the important part. You are considered innocent, and the job of the prosecutor is to prove your guilt beyond reasonable doubt. In some countries (like France) you start off guilty in a trial, and it's up to you to prove you are not.

Answer 6

You are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a COURT OF LAW. That is the only time and place it is applicable.

Answer 7

Disagree.

Answer 8

With exception to the new law Bush just got to go through. Now he can legally disappear you. Poof, your gone.

Answer 9

there are various motives people sense the courts have it arranged the place you're to blame till shown harmless, first in case you're in police custody, you're taken care of like the worst offender the international has ever huge-unfold,the police will abuse you via any means they are able to and in case you ***** it is going to likely be worse, in some situations they get excited and beat some one to lots and that they die or comfortably dedicate suicide,in the event that they set bail and additionally you have somebody to flow your bail or adequate funds to pay a bails bondsman, you would be unfastened to an quantity till your courtroom date then except you have a pocket packed with funds to pay for a robust lawyer you would be sent to reformatory, a courtroom appointed "public pretender" does precisely what his corporation tells him to do and in maximum situations see which you're convicted, so youcan be yet another slave for the reformatory industries, for a whopping 35 cents according to hour, some one suggested some element approximately they could set bail except it replaced into homicide ?? I surely have considered they decline bond for some one accused of peeing in a state park or set the bond severe adequate so the guy won't be able to possible make it, as they want you to stay in reformatory till trial so as that they are able to maintain you wakeful for some nights till now your trial so which you will look beat and the jury will look at you unshaven grimy and beat so which you look like a criminal at first and that they are going to be extra apt to convict you, they have been looking at 'regulation &ORDER on T,V, wher the to blame party continuously beats the regulation even tho he's to blame, the jury will look on the guy and picture "this one won't wreck out" so as that they convict him with out info in any respect by way of fact of this th U,S, has extra people locked up than any countr'y interior the international which includes North Korea and China, our usa has a ninety 8.8 % conviction ratio, how the hell can a guy get a easy trial with those ratios??? sure you're to blame till shown harmless, and additionally you had extra effective have deep wallet to maintain from being to blame