2006-11-14 07:56:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It isn't. They run candidates. They just don't get many votes.
2006-11-14 07:59:13 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 22⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that the "Communist party" was necessarily forbidden, I just think that nobody wanted it, thus membership is extremely low.
2006-11-14 08:16:06 · answer #2 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure, but I think the Communist Party is an active and legitimate political party in the U.S. Its just not a major party with lots of membership so you rarely hear about it.
2006-11-14 08:01:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Our Country is governed under our US Constitution.
Communism requires changing the Constitution to another form of government.
They aren't forbidden, just generally disfavored.
2006-11-14 08:02:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
THEY ARE NOT FORBIDDEN! The communists have been on the ballots even during the cold war.
2006-11-14 08:00:02 · answer #5 · answered by billy d 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
you're able to truly paintings on your grammar.... in any case, the query in itself is a sturdy one. Is u.s. fearful of Socialism? Judging via many comments on Yahoo! solutions, possible particularly positioned forward an argument of specific. even with the indisputable fact that, I doubt that's actual. lots of the people that regarded scared or what "in touch" approximately u.s. transforming into to be a "socialist united states of america" in simple terms do no longer understand plenty approximately socialism in any respect. those people take costs from Marx or base their ideals on no longer something different then a Wikipedia positioned up, the two one in all that's extra regularly then no longer, misinterpreted. Socialism isn't a great undesirable entity that is prevented in any respect expenses. in my opinion might I ever vote for the NDP (you reported your Canadian, so which you're able to have an information of the political events and their ideologies...)? No. Many vocals have very valid factors that socialism can bankrupt a united states of america. too a great number of it this is. Socialism, like Conservatism and Liberalism, is in simple terms yet another ideology. like each ideologies, it has its reward and its faults. to assert that maximum contemporary-day socialists are after a Vladimir Lenin sort Coup D'Etat isn't purely illogical yet very ignorant. There are exceptions of direction. you do no longer pass vote casting for the Communist party Of Canada and anticipate it to tutor out nicely. The NDP even with the indisputable fact that, on the assessment, is especially after redistribution of wealth. Taking from the wealthy and giving extra to the detrimental in maximum straightforward words. Jack Layton won't improve into the subsequent Josef Stalin if elected top Minister, i will assure it the two with the aid of good judgment and remark and thank you to show provisions set in the form of the Canadian government combating it from occurring. Likewise, Obama won't improve into the subsequent international dictator. in short, people in u.s. do no longer concern socialism. that's barely in spite of everything, an ideology. they're in simple terms in touch approximately their government moving into the alternative direction of their hobbies. Others, as much as no one likes to admit it, are ignorant.
2016-10-22 02:19:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They aren't. My ballot had both communist and socialist canididates.
2006-11-14 08:26:59 · answer #7 · answered by Perk1973 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isn't forbidden
2006-11-14 07:59:17 · answer #8 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, what about the national soicialist workers party?
Oh, and there is a commie party.
2006-11-14 07:59:31 · answer #9 · answered by profile image 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because it is against Human rights.
2006-11-14 07:58:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋