Considering that Sadam has already been tried (justice was served), and considering that our troops are being killed at will by an elusive enemy made up of perhaps the majority of the people in Iraq, I feel we should leave. The mission has been accomplished, and we have no business getting involved on the civil war of another country.
Fr. Abad
http://lookstare.com/blog/index.php/politics
2006-11-14 07:54:44 · 9 answers · asked by Reverend Abad 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, why you silly Arab....we need to blow up Iran next.
2006-11-14 07:56:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iraq replaced right into a conflict that got here approximately for political motives. Bush needed a legacy and observed a competent probability to extend the yank financial equipment by potential of invading Iraq and establishing up their oil fields. weapons of Mass destruction replaced into an excuse used to furnish them justification. in certainty Saddam's arsenal replaced into non existent or quite out of date by potential of the time the U. S. and Coalition invaded. by potential of invading Iraq we gained a clean best buddy in a key geopolitical area, and additionally made ourselves a fortune via oil. on the 2d allied forces are there to for defense. Iraq does not have freedom, it basically has Democracy which as Thomas Jefferson reported 'A democracy isn't something extra suitable than mob rule, the place fifty-one p.c. of the persons would eliminate the rights of the different 40-9'. often times a dictatorship is right, and If Saddam replaced into in no way ousted a million Iraqis would nonetheless be alive.
2016-12-10 09:12:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely. I think instead of taking more troops to Iraq from time to time, we need to bring them home. Maybe not all of them but gradually. I'm against the war and that dashed my hopes with Dubya (I wanted to give him a chance, even though I'm a Dem). All you've mentioned above is true and I totally agree that we need to get out but unfortunately we got in there for no reason and we need to finish what we started. Many call it the American way, I agree. However, we need to beat the insurgents that are there and then we can withdraw. If we just leave like that, the world will laugh at us even more. I supported the troops but not the war. We need to find a way out of Iraq soon before we're sorry. We need to leave Iraq with a strong government and a stable country. They need a strong military that can stop the terrorists cold but not us, the Iraqis.
2006-11-14 08:06:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have been in Iraq and have seen all sides of this. I think Saddam was a awful man and what he has coming is justice. But on the other end, I don't believe the country wants us there at all. We are still being shot at and killed everyday. Why? For what? Leave is what must be done. Those who don't want help can't be helped. Let me raise another Saddam and worship them. Our job is just to protect us from harm.
2006-11-14 08:00:28 · answer #4 · answered by Tom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. It would be a TERRIBLE TIME.
1. A bloodbath would ensue;
2. Democractic power in Iraq would be threatened;
3. America would be seen as weak militarily.
THE JOB IS NOT FINISHED.
_________
mrbrad: Thank you for your dedication to America.
2006-11-14 08:00:04 · answer #5 · answered by C = JD 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's way past our time they should have been brought back years ago. Let them kill themselves off not our boys
2006-11-14 07:56:11 · answer #6 · answered by Mary Smith 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope were gonna kill all the towl heads we can and then think about it.
2006-11-14 07:56:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes lets bring them
2006-11-14 07:59:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Tell that to Bush, and see how far you get.
2006-11-14 07:57:05 · answer #9 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋