If you look at the pictures of the so called "aftermath" of flight 93 crashing in pennsylvania and the damage to the pentagon, its obvious to see that 757 plane crashed did not occur there. Obviously there was some foul play from our US govt. So where are there planes. Does anyone have any serious ideas on what could have happened to them?
2006-11-14 07:39:29 · 19 answers · asked by c_wilson2k5 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The official story regarding the plane that crashed into the Pentagon is that it was totally consumed by burning fuel and left no wreckage. One of the many things that happened 9/11/2001 that had never happened before or since. What really mystifies me though is how many dismiss the notion that their was some government involvement in what transpired on 9/11 without even considering an alternative scenario other than the one the government has given.
2006-11-14 07:46:11 · answer #1 · answered by Frank R 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋
N591UA and N612UA, the tail numbers for Flights 93 and 175 respectively, are still valid according to the FAA, while Flights 11 and 77 are listed as destroyed.
2006-11-14 07:57:52 · answer #2 · answered by big-brother 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You use the word 'obvious' twice, but it's not obvious at all. If you've ever seen two masses collide at high speed then you'd see that a lot of destruction occurs.
Watch this crash test of an F4 Phantom crashing into a concrete wall...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AB4IEa7jTJw
it completely disintegrates. There is nothing left. I'm sure that a 757 and the Pentagon structure would act similarly.
It's not a conspiracy and if you think it is, then you're a kook!
2006-11-14 07:46:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
I appreciate the people and that i even have some American acquaintances as people they’re no longer as they’re painted via different international places and that i don’t think of It’s honest, even with the indisputable fact that to respond to your query It’s significant to renowned the reason that total drama grew to become into made up whilst it is composed of politics those everybody is organic scum, you notice in my selection the american public could see White hats and black hats, American politicians could persuade the customary public of something to justify later action, and the outcomes are printed afterward, In m opinion the effect of the attack is the entire administration of Afghanistan, and the denial of oil cargo between Iran and china subsequently reducing off an in depth pass money that grew to become into going to Iran via taxing all oil passing with the aid of Afghanistan (nearly all of the money nicely-knownshows its thank you to the USA). To me it’s unhappy to sell their own people’s lives for money yet on the different hand it’s no longer surprising it’s American politicos. and the flowing are components that should help.
2016-10-22 02:17:21 · answer #4 · answered by freer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get your "facts" correct first then ask your question!
The pentagon was attacked by the plane flight 93 on Sept. 11, 2001. The wings broke off and the impact on the building was from the body of the plane itself. This is from the people from Popular Mechanics issue of March 2003!
2006-11-14 07:42:58 · answer #5 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋
What the heck is wrong with you. The planes disintegrated. I've seen the Pentagon site after it happened and yes, there was enough destruction there. And a friend of mine actually has been tot he Flight 93 site. He's a funeral direction and helped recoer the bodies and get them back tot heir familes. I assure you that they didn't fall out of the sky.
2006-11-14 07:42:21 · answer #6 · answered by Sharp Marble 6 · 8⤊ 3⤋
There was no flight 93 or plane that crashed into the Pentagon.
they are just a figment of government propaganda.
If they weren't, there would be some plane parts for people to find.
2006-11-14 18:14:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Dude...stop. The plane crashed, the people died, leave it at that. You say things like this and the Conservatives start to throw the rest of the Liberals in with you and your ideas even when we don't believe them ourselves. You should be questioning why we took valuable assets away from the fight against Osama Bin Laden and went to war with Iraq instead. The conspiracies about 9/11 are played out and hold no water.
2006-11-14 08:24:25 · answer #8 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Everyone's answers thats and scorpiorn are close minded dumb-people!! And it shows!!! Just look at the answers!! Anyone that doesn't agree with you DOES NOT HAVE TO GET ALL ATTUTIDISH WITH THIER ANSWERS!! But they are and they are. At least the open minded people who disagree have decent respectable answers. As for my answer,...you have to be brainwashed and unconscience to think that a plane hit the pentagon when the hole is not big enough to drive a dump truck through!! Flight 94 total bullshit!! This plane would have left wreckage as well!! the whole day of 9 11 is hogwashed bullshit and its the same technique that Hitler used to gain control and go to war when he new damn well HE HAD HIS STANKING AZZ FINGERS ON IT!!
2006-11-14 07:50:38 · answer #9 · answered by The King 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋
They did find parts of Flight 93-because of the speed and force, it had "burrowed" underground. That is why you saw only a hole from the overhead shots. And you can see the plane that hit the pentagon, here:
http://www.wesh.com/video/9226097/detail.html
2006-11-14 07:43:56 · answer #10 · answered by djp8605 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋