after 4 years studying in university what items describe u better?"university degree"or"Some Graduate Level "

Question

if some one has studied in university for 4 years and he is graduated after 8 terms studying and he is an engineer now then what of these 3 : #1 "university degree" ,#2-" Some Graduate Level Courses" and 3# " Master Degree" describes him better?

Answer 1

GRaduate level courses means you took courses in a Graduate School (that is,a a school where you have to have a B.S. degree before you register) so that would be AFTER you received your first B.A. or B.S. degree. Obviously a person who has a B.A. or B.S. cannot claim to have a Masters! You have to receive an M.A. or M.S. or equivalent degree before you can claim that!

Answer 2

Greetings!

Certainly you can't be what you are not. So, when you say University Degree, is it a Masters? If so then you present yourself as such.
To say, Some Graduate Level is dangerous if the prospective employer is such as to view a glass half empty.
And of course if you hold a Masters degree that is the title you are warranted in using.

Good Luck

Answer 3

Well, it depends.
If the person (who will now be referred to as "you") only has a Bachelor's degree, then "university degree" would be the proper term.
If you have taken some grad. school classes but have not yet received your Master's degree, then "Some Graduate Level Courses" would be the proper term.
If you have graduated from Graduated school and have received your Master's degree, then "Master Degree" would be the proper term.

However, since you are unable to figure this out for yourself, I believe that the best term to describe you would either be "High School Diploma" or "Some High School, Did Not Graduate."

Answer 4

The interest in teaching creationism at an early age is based on the greater chances of implanting the ideas of religion by striking while the iron is hot. Young minds are less capable of refuting illogical reasoning and are susceptible to accepting that imaginary and mystical "reasoning" is true and therefore worthy of support. The classroom as a messenger also carries along with it a degree of credibility that can't be found outside of a learning institution. If you learn that creation science is "true" in the same room where you are taught that 1+1=2, you a less apt to ask questions on the "facts" of creation in your later years. Creation Science is not science... Intelligent design is not intelligent... [][][] r u randy [][][]