2006-11-14 06:12:30 · 4 answers · asked by Starry Eyes 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Greetings!
Yes it would, but since life (especially government) is always about money, then the reality is this.
Settlers being isolated would be not threat to England. They would tame the country introduce commerce and eventually insure their benefactors a wealth of sorts.
So the cost of sending them was far outweighed by the return on the investment.
And if they died while there? Eh, so what.
Good Luck
2006-11-14 06:17:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Landowners made a lot of money of prison labor. It beat the cost of keeping them when the American colonies were in revolt.
2006-11-14 14:21:22 · answer #2 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
but then you would have sensible laws instead of costly, expensive mazes for answers instead of efficent, cheaper methods that would not put an extra pretty pennie in the subcontracter's poket.
2006-11-14 14:17:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they weren't THAT crazy, to just KILL everybody who committed a crime.
2006-11-14 14:20:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋