how Middle-Class America heard their, {Dems} message of hope, and responded by electing them into the majority.
Well, I'm a member of this class, and I certainly don't foresee much hope in allowing:
Hillary to once again subject us to another of her social-experiments. (Hillary Health Care).
Carl Levin to pursue his aims of blocking our Ballistic Missile Defense Programs, while calling for the immediate redeployment of our troops from Iraq.
Jay Rockefeller to launch his "Phase Two" investigation of Bush.
(This inquisition is basically a hunt to blame Bush for saying "We" instead of "Us".)
John Conyers to proceed with his grand impeachment plans. (it's coming)
and the most sinister of all lib machinations:
The Dems have a plan to mandate government sponsored schools.
No longer will states or localites be the one's to manage the public school system.
This is Marxism 101--- if you don't believe me, ask Engels.
2006-11-14 04:54:06 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillary proclaimed her "new" plan yesterday.
Levin has made a career of opposing the Missile defense program in general-- show me one time he voted in favor-- I'm willing to listen,
2006-11-14 06:23:25 · update #1
read today's press releases of the dem's plans for our public school system.
You'll see what I'm talking about.
2006-11-14 06:25:51 · update #2
I need no other's opinion to shape my own.
I don't listen to Rush, I rarely watch O'Reilly (or Fox in general), and I've never misrepresented my intellect: it is what it is.
2006-11-14 06:29:52 · update #3
I hear you loud and clear. I don't think you should be so quick to pass a pessimistic judgment just yet. The democrats did win, but with fiscally and socially conservative democrats. I think Shumer and all of the other usual suspects will find a lot of in fighting and power struggles with these newly elected conservative democrats. As for Conyers, he will make an obviously politically charged, yet unsuccessful attempt to impeach Bush. All this man wants is revenge for Clinton's impeachment. He is forgetting one major component, Clinton unlike Bush, actually violated the law and told fantastic lies that no one in their right mind could believe.
2006-11-14 05:07:22 · answer #1 · answered by bowtierodz 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is unlikely to propose a health care program; it flopped for her last time.
Levin was correct to oppose funding for the ballistic missile defense system -- it was antiquated. Bush Sr. also wanted to dismantle these programs, as did Dick Cheney. Read Bush's State of the Union speeches, 1991 and 1992.
Investigations will happen with this Congress, but the Democrats say they won't impeach. They'll keep the hearings in committees, and proceed with other business elsewhere in the Congress. Avoid C-Span for the next 2 years, unless you want to be bored.
Public schools are "government sponsored" -- what do you mean - federal control? The only federal control of public schools is through Bush's No Child Left Behind program of federal standards, testing and sanctions. Are you against that, or is it okay because it was a Republican program and was opposed by unionized teachers
2006-11-14 05:09:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I trust you approximately Reid. i'm unsure what Nevada electorate have been thinking whilst they back this guy to the Senate. He has way too plenty ability and exerts it over all u.s.. Reid chooses to miss on the subject of the information. Schumer and Durbin have much less ability over each physique, although all 3 have philosophies very distinctive from mine.
2016-10-22 02:04:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it wasn't for your glaringly-apparent agenda to undermine anything even remotely Liberal, your narrow-minded, half-witted attack on issues beyond your ability to fully comprehend, might actually be mistaken for intellect.
Tell me, what was it exactly about Bush and the Republican Congress that made you so myopic? The massive debt? Tax cuts for the wealthy? The abomination in Iraq? The scandals? The abuse of power? Or perhaps you actually believe the load of crap Rush and O'Reilly regurgitate every day?
2006-11-14 05:46:07 · answer #4 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey dummy!! Tom DeLay wasn't the speaker of the house.
She is correct. We a certainly doomed now that the socialists have taken over. Some many reasons, so little time.
Untrained chimps would be better than a democrat.
2006-11-14 05:05:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
You have no class. A typical Bushwhackoff is a Mama's Boy who hates his Daddy for not getting rich and spoiling him. Go suck your thumb and drool while listening to your drug-addict drafdodger, Rush Limbaugh.
2006-11-14 05:15:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with everything you said except your instruction to ask Engels. Last I checked, he was still dead.
2006-11-14 05:41:43 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's not Marxism 101. It's Republican sour grapes 101.
Pelosi will make a better speaker than the hateful and corrupt Tom Delay.
2006-11-14 04:59:27 · answer #8 · answered by cannon Ball! 3 · 3⤊ 6⤋
You are right on target! The Dems are going to destroy us!
2006-11-14 05:05:27 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
this is what happens when you re-pugs didnt win.alot of stuff will finally be brought to light that the re-pugs have been hiding!
2006-11-14 04:59:59 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 4⤊ 6⤋