Form and function the eternal dilemma for an architect.
Some people say form follows function others say function should follow form.
Well, in my personal point of view, I say function is more important than form. You can have a beautiful room but if it doesn't work, it will be a matter of time until it's not functional and aesthetic. Because you will do the best to turn it into a functional space.
On the other hand if you have a building that is completely functional, you might end up with an industrial-looking building, when in fact you wanted a cosy-looking house.
However, whenever I am doing an architectural project, I always try to find a balance between form and function. But if I have to sacrifice something, it will always be form (if I can't really do anything else, or I'm running out of time.)
A good example to this issue, are the follies in La Villete from Tschumi. This buildings look great, the red colour against the green from the park is great. But they have no function, you can't get inside the building and live space. The follies are there only to be contemplated from the outside. These buildings are quite controversial, as the theory behind them go beyond the function-form dilemma. But it's a good example.
Hope I helped.
2006-11-14 03:49:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by . 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my technical drawing and architectural design courses, my teacher made a point to always mention that most good architects emphasize the "form follows function" motto.
What it means is that you can be creative and develop buildings or designs that are quite elaborate and look like works of art, but you should always remember that it is important to keep in mind what the designed product is going to be used for.
For example, if you are designing a building for a wheelchair-bound person, you would not want to develop it with lots of stairs, high cabinets, and narrow hallways and doorways.
The "form follows function" motto applies to just about any design. You have to interpret it based on the item you are designing.
2006-11-14 03:52:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by SteveN 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Something may look fantastic ... wonderfully aesthetically pleasing, but a pointless piece of work if not practical. For example, for a bathroom to have form and function, the taps must be accessible, space to move around etc. .... Towel rails on the ceiling may look nice, but slightly daft.
Form and function are as high on most scales unless defined otherwise. Folly is a form rarely used.
2006-11-14 03:40:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by brianthesnailuk2002 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
you ought to confess that right now people do some fantastically strange issues, too. are you able to describe it? No. anybody is merely people. anybody is human, and prefer people, all of us have our little quirks and unique personalities. that doesn't recommend that merely on account which you heard/observed a gay person doing some thing strange that all and sundry gay anybody is strange. It merely means that they are human. via judging this form of vast team of people, and via saying 'gay people do strange issues', you're insulting many people. No, you're no longer insulting gay people via asking this question, on account which you're precise, you ought to ask it approximately anybody. although, you ought to achieve how slender-minded and straightforward this question is, and that there is lots extra to all gay people being strange. -Cyndi
2016-12-14 07:00:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by pfarr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no idea
2006-11-14 04:06:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by charlie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋