English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-14 02:47:07 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

26 answers

I'm not a big fan of either. But I saw a bumper sticker once that said, "When Clinton lied, nobody died." In other words they've both lied and done wrong things, but at least Clinton didn't lead us into a war that was probably unnecessary.

2006-11-14 02:49:54 · answer #1 · answered by LisaT 5 · 3 4

YES! Clinton's morals were warped and he likes women too much but he is an excellent business man. He was an excellent president. I would rather have Bill groping women than thousand of our men and women in the military dying for no reason!

Jr couldn't find his way out of a paper bad with the top open. If he was truly smart he would have fired Rumsfeld before the elections not after. Just proves my point. Oh but maybe Rove or Cheney didn't pull the puppet (Jr) strings. We all know that Cheney and Rumsfeld are buddies...hope Rumsfeld is smart enough not to go hunting with him.

2006-11-14 11:37:09 · answer #2 · answered by krchamp 3 · 1 2

No Clinton is an appeaser,President Bush gets things done!

2006-11-17 15:24:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What was the National debt when Bill Clinton took office? What was it when he left? Now George? George had 2 towers fall and a deadly hurricane and is fighting a war! When I see you people talking about Clinton and how he reduced the debt I just laugh! It went up dumb@ss!

2006-11-14 10:58:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Bush is a warmonger but Clinton was a wimp. I think that the stronger of the two forces is better. At least our nation doesn't consist of 13 states again. Clinton probably in response to 9/11 or the threats from other nations would have sold off all our land. Or actually, "Here Hugo, you can have Alaska and Texas. Oh yeah, here Osama you have this. Thanks for not killing me! Oh yeah sure you guys can have it all for free! Oh and Mexico wants some too? lol! Sure! Have it all!"

2006-11-14 10:53:06 · answer #5 · answered by tcreede 2 · 2 3

By leaps and bounds, far better. We did not lose 2852 brave Americans under Clinton. We also did not take over 30,000 wounded under Clinton. The Iraq war will cost working class tax payers over $2 trillion, Clinton did not have that problem. We have a $9 trillion debt. Clinton had a balanced budget. Clinton even paid on the debt twice. Bush was told by PDB that "Bin Laden was determined to attack the USA. Bush was also told "they would use hi jacked comm. planes to blow up buildings and that they were already in this country". Bush ignored that PDB calling it a "historical document", so did Rice. Clinton would not have ignored that report. Clinton also tried very hard to kill Bin Laden but the CIA and FBI would not sign off for him.

2006-11-14 10:57:16 · answer #6 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 2 4

He wasn't a bad president- just an immoral and cheating husband- which is a horrible example for the leader of our country. Bush is moral and decent but I think made very bad choices in his staff and cabinet- it really tripped him and the country up---as to compare, I wonder how Clinton would have delt with 911? Or IraQ? I don't know- one can do that really---

2006-11-14 10:56:15 · answer #7 · answered by ARTmom 7 · 3 2

Clinton was a joke. Bush has brought respectibility back to the White House.

2006-11-14 10:57:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Clinton Ruled as president!!! Honestly. So Clinton cheated on his wife that did not impact our country at all. I don't even think of that when I think of clinton. THis is becuase he needs a personal life too. Also Clinton got us so far out of debt then boom bush steps in and we are back at, well below square one.

2006-11-14 10:53:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

he definitely was,at least he didn't draw Americans into wars they can never win.War is never the answer,he was a very good and
charismatic leader.
As for his womanizing,it's only natural for such a good- looking man,women don't leave them alone,and I'm sorry for you Americans,your media people are horrible talking about the
President PRIVATE life.In France,all the the media knew about
Mitterand's daughter it was only published after he agreed to it.

2006-11-14 12:26:41 · answer #10 · answered by asso 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers