English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-14 00:42:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Pros:

-No more Browns
-Eh, it's Ohio

Cons:

-Nuclear fallout will find its way into neighboring states and Lake Erie.
-Health problems caused by nuclear fallout will cost billions of dollars in medical care.
-Affordable vacation spots such as Geauga Lake, Cedar Point, and the Rock n' Roll Hall of Fame.
-Economy will suffer due to loss of manufacturing plants, including tires, rubber, steel, tools, and Smuckers jams and jellies.
-Loss of farms that produce soybeans, corn, tomatoes, cattle, hogs, eggs and dairy products.
-Loss of 13 state universities that provide relatively affordable, qualtiy higher education.
-Loss of historical sites, including Native American burial mounds, the birthplace of Ulysses S. Grant, and Kent State University.

2006-11-14 02:05:33 · answer #1 · answered by sparky52881 5 · 1 1

Well, it would eliminate The Ohio State Buckeyes football team from the National Championship race.

This would allow (hopefully) the Florida Gators to get a shot.

2006-11-14 01:11:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well, many years ago I knew a girl from Ohio -- her name was Annie, and she was blonde and sweet and oh so passionate. I'd hate to think that anything terrible might happen to her. Other than that, I can't think of any reason not to nuke Ohio.

2006-11-14 00:45:57 · answer #3 · answered by cynical_about_future_generations 2 · 2 0

the only cons to the bombing of the two eastern cities have been the heavy dying tolls. it extremely is merely no longer considered as completely justified via the international. the eastern attacked Pearl Harbor on their very own volition. do no longer turn a bull interior the nutsac in case you ain't arranged to be gored, son. between the biggest "professional's" which you ought to show is that on account that this journey, Japan has grow to be a very non violent usa. not extra bombs. not extra wars. in elementary terms self-protection.

2016-12-14 06:55:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Can't think of many pros but I know one mother in particular you damn well better watch your as* for in Kentucky you go making stupid accusations like that when her children are near there, boy oh boy do you sit on that brain?Gosh kinda like saying what would be the pros and cons of nuking cora the exploreres butt, eh?

2006-11-14 00:47:30 · answer #5 · answered by Angel B 3 · 0 1

Is Ohio even a state?

2006-11-14 01:57:56 · answer #6 · answered by I'manalienfrog 5 · 1 0

Make sure Toledo gets hit, lol.

The spread of nukes is a very serious issue. Today, 3rd world nations, and rogue dictators have them. The terrorist will get them eventually. Very dark days ahead.

2006-11-14 00:46:07 · answer #7 · answered by Villain 6 · 2 0

Just program the voting terminals a little better next election. There will be less fallout that way, and it can all be covered as long as Republicans win.

2006-11-14 00:48:31 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

You would get rid of a lot of useless nuts.(definition of a Buckeye) and cause millions of dollars worth of improvements!! LOL

2006-11-14 00:57:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Do you have in-laws in Ohio or something?

2006-11-14 00:45:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers