2006-11-13 22:02:53 · 29 answers · asked by bluenose 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Ye...its a shame such a alented musician who gave us so much joy and fun should be put aside for his personal perversities.Hey, Bill Clinton is still getting a cool $100,000 per speech, that he gives at various institutions....
2006-11-13 22:06:42 · answer #1 · answered by zinc 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes but some people conveniently forget that people are innocent until PROVEN guilty. Personally I am not a huge fan but I can appreciate his talent. If he did anything to those kids I'd be the first to say lock him up but I wasn't there, I don't know what happenned, no one here does so no one has the right to judge... Now let the thumbs down begin :p
2006-11-14 06:14:40 · answer #2 · answered by QueenofSummertime 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes people should just judge him on his music because nobody knows for sure that he did anything wrong! Personally I think it was just a couple of gold diggers who wanted his money!!
â¥â¥We Love You Michael!!!!â¥â¥
2006-11-14 10:11:41 · answer #3 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well...it depends, i believe that his music definitely changed the world, had a big impact. I mean, the album thriller was one of the most important albums of our time.
As for his "extra-curricular" activities, he get fair judgement, just because he is a superstar, i don't think that we should turn a blind eye to some things he does which are just not acceptable and are immoral!
2006-11-14 06:09:49 · answer #4 · answered by Coyote 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Would you hire a plumber if he was a child molester, even if he was a very good plumber. (would you judge him on his work). Its our money from record sales that have put him in the position to do what he`s doing (and getting away with).
2006-11-14 11:15:56 · answer #5 · answered by bodtheimpaler 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. What a stupid question. In that case let Gary Glitter off the hook and Johnathon King, need I give you more examples??
2006-11-14 06:19:03 · answer #6 · answered by jeeps 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He hasn't done anything good for years! Wacko Jacko was the best in the 80's, but after all the kiddie fiddling, he lost the plot big time!?
2006-11-14 06:07:59 · answer #7 · answered by supernova281977 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
MJs acievements dont take away from his crimes any more than his crimes negate his achievements. He is simultaneously an accomplished musician and a dirty kiddy fiddler.
People seem obsessed with deciding if he is one or the other.
He is both.
2006-11-14 06:23:16 · answer #8 · answered by ewan123ewan 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Considering the courts have not found sufficient evidence of anything I would say yes. Although I haven't heard any of his music in a couple of years, what I remember was pretty good.
2006-11-14 06:06:18 · answer #9 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
hes asking to be judged in other ways, i mean look at him, not to mention his crazy lifestyle.
He is a music genius though.
2006-11-14 07:06:29 · answer #10 · answered by Catwhiskers 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋