who's ur choice??
2006-11-13 18:45:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
You're comparing a striker to a midfielder. How can I choose?
It depends on what my team needs more, an attacker or a midfielder.
Overall I think Torres is better, because he is closer to being the finished product. Fabregas has 2 or more years, to settle into his permanent style.
2006-11-13 18:49:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Fernando Torres.
But lately Fabregas has been better
2006-11-14 04:30:50 · answer #2 · answered by _______ 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Francesc 'Cesc' Fabregas Soler of Arsenal.
2006-11-14 09:50:21 · answer #3 · answered by foongwk140804 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
My reply is that you can't compare one midfielder with a striker.But if I have to choose then I will go for Fabregas.Because he is only 19 and he is regarded as one of the most creative midfielder in the world.Wenger sold viera because he knew Fabregas is more than capable of filling the gap.Not only he is very creative in the midfield,he is strong,and his finishing is also superb.That gives him an extra edge over others.Torres is also very young(probably 22),his finishing is also very good.But he lacks the creativity Fabragas has.
2006-11-14 04:30:17 · answer #4 · answered by arijit hazra 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
FERNANDO "el niño" TORRES!!! But Fabregas is a great player too
2006-11-14 04:33:06 · answer #5 · answered by toniDK 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Torres,hes a better player..
2006-11-14 05:42:59 · answer #6 · answered by Answeraway-YNWA 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
fabregas
2006-11-14 04:54:04 · answer #7 · answered by rizwano 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
two different types of players but i would have to say cesc far more important expierence
2006-11-14 16:37:55 · answer #8 · answered by redballs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
fabregas any day.
2006-11-14 03:27:24 · answer #9 · answered by dazzle 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋