English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just assertions for the record please no combatives please

2006-11-13 17:37:36 · 4 answers · asked by dogpatch USA 7 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

4 answers

The Straight Dope covered this one, got it wrong initially, and admitted it later, all here:

2006-11-13 18:05:43 · answer #1 · answered by Christopher C 2 · 1 0

properly it incredibly capability "hugs and kisses" yet indexed decrease than are some info in case you relatively should be conscious of ... the 1st point out in literature of XXX for kisses on the backside of a letter grew to become into in 1901, in accordance to the Oxford English Dictionary. The X itself is incredibly outdated. The custom is going decrease back to the early Christian era, while a go mark or "X" grew to become into the comparable as a sworn oath. The go talked related to the go of Calvary and the 1st letter of the Greek be conscious for Christ, Xristos. on a similar time as low as a hundred and fifty years in the past, no longer many human beings could examine or write. The "X" on the backside of a rfile took the placement of a signature. they could kiss the "X" as a crucifix or bible grew to become into kissed to emphasise the cost of the mark. It grew to become into this custom that carry approximately the "X" representing a kiss. there's no longer lots time-commemorated related to the beginnings of the "O". this is a North American custom. The "O" represents the palms in a circle around yet somebody else. palms crossed in front of you do no longer mean the "X" as a hug! The "O" is the hug.

2016-12-17 09:42:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It's a logical contradiction.

2006-11-13 17:47:16 · answer #3 · answered by rumplestiltskin12357 3 · 0 0

You're so strange that everyone else appears normal.

2006-11-13 17:58:16 · answer #4 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers